Well, now Crimson Trace is getting into the game and will make a new version of their Laserguard available for the Nano in mid-September.

http://www.crimsontrace.com/pr...nsumer%2BeNewsletter

Per CT, Model LG-483 should be available 09-15-12 for those of us with old people eyes. I've had CT grips on other small handguns I've owned, and they were quite a positive. My Nano might just deserve a CT laser as well.

My wife and I have shot a friends Crimson Trace equipped pistol and she was all for me getting the laser for our Nano.
I just took the plunge and pre ordered one. Here is a website with a good price, free batteries for life and free shipping.
http://www.crimsontracelaser.com/ber...483-p-216.html

Thanks guys....been waitng for this. Just ordered mine as well - using the link provided. Appreciate the heads up.

Have CT laser grips on 6 guns and have had no issues with any of their products. Looking forward to #7 whenever it actually ships.

I was thinking with a two finger grip I might not be able to handle the ct grip, but with an extended mag.....

On your other small guns does the ct grip make it harder to control?

It's not a problem on my Glock 39 (.45 Gap) or Ruger LC9. The Nano grip is somewhat shorter than the LC9 so I guess we'll see.

Nice to see that they have the night sights available & extended mags coming soon, The Crimson laser is attached to the trigger guard & looks like they will have to come up with a different style holster which may take some time.

I will be getting some mag extentions & maybe Night Sights, Don't think I'll go for the Crimsoms.

At first glance it appears my Remora 4ART holster will work with the CT Laser.

quote:

Originally posted by MT357Magnum:
Nice to see that they have the night sights available & extended mags coming soon, The Crimson laser is attached to the trigger guard & looks like they will have to come up with a different style holster which may take some time.

I will be getting some mag extentions & maybe Night Sights, Don't think I'll go for the Crimsoms.

I am on the same track you are. The night sights are great, and will be happy wen the extensions are out.

I just recently picked up a Nano of my own, so far it seems like a great ccw pistol. The trigger is really smooth and provided you can get past the length of the pull I think most will really love it.

Budspolicesupply has a great deal on the Nano for those who are looking $405.00 shipped to your FFL

Nice review! How's the recoil? I haven't had a chance to fire a true sub-compact 9mm like the Nano yet, but I know some of the smaller .380s can be pretty unpleasant.

quote:

Originally posted by TAC-SCI:
Nice review! How's the recoil? I haven't had a chance to fire a true sub-compact 9mm like the Nano yet, but I know some of the smaller .380s can be pretty unpleasant.

Recoil is not bad at all, and I've run a magazine of Speer Gold Dot 124 grain JHP through mine fairly rapid fire.

quote:

Originally posted by TAC-SCI:
Nice review! How's the recoil? I haven't had a chance to fire a true sub-compact 9mm like the Nano yet, but I know some of the smaller .380s can be pretty unpleasant.

Last Friday my wife and I fired another another 100 through our Nano (total 942). She shot 70 and said the recoil was no problem. Of course I have never found the recoil to be a problem.

Awesome reveiw and Thanks for sharing....

Comptac has released nano holsters now

In what appears to be a flood of new products, now CompTac is getting in the game and offering a MTAC application (among other holster styles as well) for the Nano. As a disclaimer, I have no affiliation with CompTac other than being a fan of the MTAC.

Just thought some Nano owners here might be interested.

Looks very Glockesque internally, Id like to do a side-by-side shootoff with the Nano and a 26.

quote:

Originally posted by bigdeal:
In what appears to be a flood of new products, now CompTac is getting in the game and offering a MTAC application (among other holster styles as well) for the Nano. As a disclaimer, I have no affiliation with CompTac other than being a fan of the MTAC.

Just thought some Nano owners here might be interested.

Beat you by two minutes but your post is better than mine

quote:

Originally posted by nf9648:
Looks very Glockesque internally, Id like to do a side-by-side shootoff with the Nano and a 26.

I have had both, and have shot both somewhat extensively, and I just don't think they should be compared to each other. The G26 is an awesome little gun, but is quite a bit larger and heavier than the Nano. As such, it eats up recoil better and offers more ammo capacity. The Nano on the other hand is smaller, lighter, and narrower, and although it carries fewer rounds and is a little more subject to recoil, it still makes a fantastic deep carry CCW. They're both terrific guns that serve their designated purposes well, I just don't believe they should be viewed as competitive offerings.

quote:

Originally posted by mhughes:

quote:

Originally posted by bigdeal:
In what appears to be a flood of new products, now CompTac is getting in the game and offering a MTAC application (among other holster styles as well) for the Nano. As a disclaimer, I have no affiliation with CompTac other than being a fan of the MTAC.

Just thought some Nano owners here might be interested.

Beat you by two minutes but your post is better than mine

Not better, just longer..............

Thought I would offer my first impressions of the Nano. I reently had the opportunity to attend a close quarters pistol class at which were a couple Nanos. It ws not a strenuous class for either the students or guns with around 300rds fired over 3.5 hours or so. I witnessed the front sight fall off one of the Nanos and oth experiened seeral malfunctions though to be fair those may hae been shooter induced since neither of the guys running them had any business being in that course. Overall I was unimpressed but that's just me.