SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  SIG Pistols    Tungsten Guide Rod

Moderators: Chris Orndorff, LDD
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Tungsten Guide Rod Login/Join 
Member
posted
Has anyone used a tungsten guide rod. I bought one for my P229 .40/.357 Sig. I haven't gotten to shoot it yet, so I was curious if anyone else has. If so was there any noticeable difference in recoil or muzzle flip?
 
Posts: 87 | Location: Arizona  | Registered: March 21, 2013Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Unapologetic Old
School Curmudgeon
Picture of Lord Vaalic
posted Hide Post
I have one in a Glock 19. I cant say I really noticed any difference


---------------------------------
- "This town reminds me of something in the bible."
- "Which part?"
- "The part right before god gets angry"
 
Posts: 7225 | Location: TN | Registered: December 18, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
I have purchased and used many stainless steel guide rods for a variety of firearms to included the P229 40/357. I didn't notice any difference at all! Truthfully, I didn't expect any reduction in muzzle flip or recoil, I just wanted to replace a plastic or hollow tube with something solid. Subsequently, I have found that I should have just saved my money as it really serves no technical improvement over a plastic or hollow tube. Mentally, it just makes me feel good to have a solid steel rod over a piece of plastic or hollow aluminum.......In closing, some will say that the extra ounce that the solid guide rod weights will dampen recoil and or muzzle flip. I have to roll my eyes on those type of statements and perceptions. It just ain't so Joe.
 
Posts: 184 | Location: Virginia Beach, VA | Registered: August 03, 2012Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Freethinker
Picture of sigfreund
posted Hide Post
Although the standard solid P229 rod isn’t tungsten, it doesn’t weigh an ounce more than the hollow metal rod, only about 2/3 ounce more.




“Most men … can seldom accept the simplest and most obvious truth if it … would oblige them to admit the falsity of conclusions … which they have woven, thread by thread, into the fabrics of their lives.”
— Leo Tolstoy
 
Posts: 37257 | Location: 10,150 Feet Above Sea Level in Colorado | Registered: April 04, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
That's just the
Flomax talking
Picture of GaryBF
posted Hide Post
quote:
If so was there any noticeable difference in recoil or muzzle flip?

YES! It's called the placebo effect-it's your imagination.
 
Posts: 10832 | Location: St. Louis, Missouri | Registered: February 04, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Gotcha, I figured that was probably the case. It does look cool though!!
 
Posts: 87 | Location: Arizona  | Registered: March 21, 2013Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Skate:
Has anyone used a tungsten guide rod. I bought one for my P229 .40/.357 Sig. I haven't gotten to shoot it yet, so I was curious if anyone else has. If so was there any noticeable difference in recoil or muzzle flip?


Buy or borrow a timer, think for a little what would make a reasonable test, and see if you can find the difference. That's what I did when I tested a tungsten rod in my 1911, and steel rods in my other guns.
 
Posts: 115 | Registered: April 03, 2014Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of MaSigchist
posted Hide Post
A solid Tungsten guide rod weighs around 3 oz. Most of the ones sold as tungsten rods are actually stainless rods with a tungsten core and are not as heavy. In the hands of a good shooter the extra weight does make a difference in testing done with a timer.


-Scott

SPDTool LLC - Pocket Sized Field Armorer Tools
http://www.spdtool.com

-Certified Sig Sauer Armorer
-Certified Smith & Wesson M&P Armorer
-NRA Pistol Instructor
-NRA Shotgun Instructor
-NRA Range Safety Officer
-NRA Metallic cartridge & Shotgun Reloading Instructor
-MA Certified Firearms Instructor
 
Posts: 846 | Location: Greenfield, MA USA | Registered: May 13, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Mine is a tungsten core that weighs 2oz. I'm going to test it this weekend. I have 3 229's, one stock with an SRT and a hollow rod. The one with the tungsten rod, also has an SRT, and a Legion. I can configure them all with as .357 Sig and use the same ammo.
 
Posts: 87 | Location: Arizona  | Registered: March 21, 2013Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of Billy346
posted Hide Post
If you're trying to reduce the muzzle flip on a P229, you can change the ammo that you are shooting. For me, .357 does not exhibit any muzzle flip at all. For .40, the 165 grain is pretty jumpy, whereas the 180 grain shoots like a .45 ACP.


"Like a horse has its rider, and the sky has its moon, a man has his loneliness, mistaken as pride." -Longmire
 
Posts: 527 | Location: Northern Virginia | Registered: January 19, 2013Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of Nipper
posted Hide Post
Recoil and muzzle flip are very subjective. IMO, good fundamentals are more important. Run comparison tests yourself and get back to us.

The primary thing a Tungsten GR does is slightly change the balance of the pistol. May or may not be an improvement, depending on the shooter. Even with balance, my experience has been it takes a longer barrel, like a P226 length pistol to notice the difference with carbon steel GR's.

I have a Wilson Pro (Cmdr) with a FL Tungsten GR (WC). The purpose was to equal the general feel and weight of my 1911 GM. All I can say is I like the feel of the gun with that GR. Subjectively speaking. Smile


______________________
An expert is one who knows more and more about less and less until he knows absolutely everything about nothing. --Nicholas Murray Butler
 
Posts: 3952 | Location: Northeast | Registered: June 29, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
addicted to trailing-throttle oversteer
Picture of soggy_spinout
posted Hide Post
With a melting point nearly 2 1/2 times higher than steel, they work darn near flawless if you plan on converting your gun into full auto and doing a subsequent meltdown test for a YouTube vid. If that's not on your docket, save your money if you haven't been suckered into buying one already.
 
Posts: 7602 | Location: Drippin' wet | Registered: April 18, 2010Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of Jupiter
posted Hide Post
Back in the mid 1980s during my IPSC days, I went through 2 or 3 of them.
They are brittle and I would never use one in my carry guns.


Diligentia, Vis, Celeritas


"People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf."
-- George Orwell




 
Posts: 3359 | Location: Mississippi | Registered: August 09, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Honestly I've been laid up recovering from a hip replacement and had too much time on my hands. I stumbled across these guide rods surfing the net and thought I'd give it a try. I've also installed Gray Guns spring kits in 2 of my guns, and 3 SRT kits. Then I bought a set of Arkansas stones and did some polishing on a few pieces.

I've bought 6 guns in the last 2 months, and lots of other stuff from Amazon. My wife suspended my internet purchasing privileges, and is ready for me to get back to work!!

I'm shooting tomorrow, so I'll post my results after that.
 
Posts: 87 | Location: Arizona  | Registered: March 21, 2013Reply With QuoteReport This Post
orareyougladtoseeme
Picture of isthatasiginyourpocket
posted Hide Post
I made a tungsten guide rod my 320 RX and it definitely reduced muzzle rise and the sight settles back on target better for me. It's physics, it lowers the center of gravity and adds mass at the muzzle. Is it worth the extra cost, I'm not sure. It's not a huge difference but it's noticeable. I made mine out of high strength tungsten and it was $90 in material cost for two rods. At production quantities I can't see them selling for less than $40 or so.
 
Posts: 2442 | Location: Blaine,MN USA | Registered: March 06, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Diversified Hobbyist
Picture of Steve 22X
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by isthatasiginyourpocket:
I made a tungsten guide rod my 320 RX and it definitely reduced muzzle rise and the sight settles back on target better for me. It's physics, it lowers the center of gravity and adds mass at the muzzle. Is it worth the extra cost, I'm not sure. It's not a huge difference but it's noticeable. I made mine out of high strength tungsten and it was $90 in material cost for two rods. At production quantities I can't see them selling for less than $40 or so.


All else remaining equal, lowering the center of gravity would increase muzzle flip.
Moving the center of gravity forward, which the tungsten rod would also do, would tend to decrease it.
Overall it would likely be a wash.


-----------------------------------
Regards, Steve
The anticipation is often greater than the actual reward
 
Posts: 2287 | Location: Wylie, Texas | Registered: November 12, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Rumors of my death
are greatly exaggerated
Picture of coloradohunter44
posted Hide Post
I've had one in my P229/9 for years. I like the way it balances it out.



"Someday I hope to be half the man my bird-dog thinks I am."


 
Posts: 8604 | Location: Front Range, Colorado  | Registered: July 23, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
fugitive from reality
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Jupiter:
Back in the mid 1980s during my IPSC days, I went through 2 or 3 of them.
They are brittle and I would never use one in my carry guns.


This. I use one in a bullseye 1911, but I've seen several break in matches so for me it's a no-no for anything but a range toy.


_____________________________
'I'm pretty fly for a white guy'.

 
Posts: 5362 | Location: Newyorkistan | Registered: March 28, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
I finally made it to the range. I can definitely tell a difference in the weight between them. I can't say for sure that the extra weight reduced muzzle flip, because I didn't feel like I had a problem with that on any of them. I do think the extra weight soaked up a little of the felt recoil. It could be in my head, and they all felt very similar. It wasn't enough of a difference that I'll be buying one for all of my guns, but I'm not disappointed either.
 
Posts: 87 | Location: Arizona  | Registered: March 21, 2013Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of mrtuna
posted Hide Post
The alloy Sigs seem to soak up the recoil pretty well but I wish someone would make a reliable P320 Compact steel and/or tungsten core guide rod. The Sig party line is that bore axis doesn't matter but it actually does if you don't have enough weight to keep the muzzle flat. I can always add a rail light but that's not always practical.


Training as often as possible!
NSSF Media Member


 
Posts: 1577 | Location: Las Vegas, NV | Registered: May 31, 2010Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata  
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  SIG Pistols    Tungsten Guide Rod

© SIGforum 2017