SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  SIG Pistols    Browning Hi Power: Remove magazine disconnect or leave as is?
Page 1 2 3 

Moderators: Chris Orndorff, lbj, LDD

Closed Topic Closed
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
  Login/Join 
Member
Picture of elberettas
Posted
Hello Everyone,

I have a Browning Hi Power Mark III (1993) that I purchased about a month ago. I'm contemplating wheather I should remove the magazine disconnect or not? What do you folks think? Should I remove it or just leave it as it is? Also, Is this something I can do myself or do I have to send it to a gunsmith? Thanks!


GO CHARGERS!!!
 
Posts: 491 | Location: San Diego, CA | Registered: July 02, 2008Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
My own personal opinion is,if its for carry leave it stock!If you do not like a mag disconnect on your carry pistol,buy a different carry pistol.

I am sure others will disagree!
 
Posts: 324 | Location: Western New York | Registered: May 31, 2003Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
I agree with roadrash. If you ever had to use the browning for SD, a lawyer could make quite a deal of your "rash and poor judgement" in eliminating an OM safety device. I have a HP35 (1977) - I've gotten use the the trigger.
 
Posts: 8 | Registered: August 22, 2008Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of USAF_Hk
Posted Hide Post
I never bought in to the "Lawyers will skin you" thing. I've never seen proof that It has ever happened.

I would lose the mag safety. I saw a good walk through online somewhere that had very good photos to go with it, I just can't remember where.


Rob






I am an American Airman:
Wingman, Leader, Warrior.
I will never leave an Airman behind,
I will never falter, and I will not fail.

From The Airman's Creed
 
Posts: 2064 | Location: Wallingford, PA | Registered: August 04, 2003Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
How likely is it you will be in a running gun battle with this weapon, need to do a mag change, and have to discharge the weapon before you can insert the new one but after you drop the old one?
 
Posts: 2766 | Location: Lexington, KY | Registered: October 15, 2006Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of Black Majik
Posted Hide Post
I vote to remove it. It's easy to do

http://forum.1911forum.com/showthread.php?t=133740


-Richard
 
Posts: 4066 | Location: Orange County, California | Registered: October 01, 2003Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of USAF_Hk
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Black Majik:
I vote to remove it. It's easy to do

http://forum.1911forum.com/showthread.php?t=133740


That's the one I had seen.


Rob






I am an American Airman:
Wingman, Leader, Warrior.
I will never leave an Airman behind,
I will never falter, and I will not fail.

From The Airman's Creed
 
Posts: 2064 | Location: Wallingford, PA | Registered: August 04, 2003Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
haven't dealt with many lawyer then..................
 
Posts: 8 | Registered: August 22, 2008Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
Whether you want to take it out is a decision you'll have to make. I find that it improves the trigger and I think that magazine disconnect safeties raise a few safety concerns of their own. If you decide to take it out, it isn't very difficult.

If you do go by the instructions at the link that the others beat me to posting, do not/not remove the trigger pin in the direction he shows in the first photo. Drive it from the rounded side as several posters later in the thread note. A couple of issues to consider:

1) It is very easy to mar the frame removing the main trigger pin (trust me on this one), which can be a pain to get out. Use electrical tape or something similar to cover the rounded side of the pin and surrounding frame. Get the gun firmly braced on a hard surface (wrapped as necessary to avoid scratching on the bottom and with the necessary clearance for the pin to come out). Using an over-sized, flat-faced punch, give it a firm blow with a hammer. This should get it started out -- the toughest part of the job -- so you can use an appropriately sized punch to finish its removal.

2) The magazine safety disconnect is difficult to put back in. I tried once just for the sake of trying and gave up. There may be a trick to it that makes it easy, but...

Chris
 
Posts: 167 | Location: NC | Registered: December 28, 2007Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
If a carry/SD gun-leave it in--If only a range toy-take it out---once its out, you might need a gunsmith to put it back in--dmd
 
Posts: 1193 | Location: miami beach fl | Registered: October 06, 2005Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of USAF_Hk
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by colez:
haven't dealt with many lawyer then..................


I've known plenty, and I'm still waiting on proof that this has ever lead to a conviction.

Smile


Rob






I am an American Airman:
Wingman, Leader, Warrior.
I will never leave an Airman behind,
I will never falter, and I will not fail.

From The Airman's Creed
 
Posts: 2064 | Location: Wallingford, PA | Registered: August 04, 2003Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by USAF_Hk:
quote:
Originally posted by colez:
haven't dealt with many lawyer then..................


I've known plenty, and I'm still waiting on proof that this has ever lead to a conviction.

Smile



In criminal court it probably won't matter much.

In civil court ,it paints a picture and can sway the jury .
 
Posts: 324 | Location: Western New York | Registered: May 31, 2003Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
I took mine out, makes the trigger smoother. It's not a carry gun but if it were ever used & I had to defend the decision, I'm sure a good lawyer can easily defend the modification as most pistols do not have a mag disconnect.


IF YOU AREN'T HANDLOADING, YOU AREN'T SHOOTING ENOUGH! If you could make your own gas, wouldn't you???
 
Posts: 1446 | Location: ca, usa | Registered: February 17, 2004Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
I Wanna Missile
Picture of tanksoldier
Posted Hide Post
I'm not overly worried about the lawyer thing myself. However I do think it is shortsighted to circumvent any safety feature of any weapon.

It was designed to work that way. If you don't like it buy some other pistol.



"I am a Soldier. I fight where I'm told and I win where I fight."
GEN George S. Patton, Jr.
 
Posts: 4869 | Location: Colorado | Registered: January 25, 2006Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of FunGunner
Posted Hide Post
Ditch it!


__________________________________________________
I hope I never get as much government as I pay for!
 
Posts: 699 | Location: No where near good! | Registered: March 29, 2005Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
Why even give them the opportunity to raise the issue--esp in your CA anti-gun climate! Better to even avoid the issue--Don't be there!! dmd
 
Posts: 1193 | Location: miami beach fl | Registered: October 06, 2005Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
BMR
Member
Posted Hide Post
Get rid of it. The trigger pull will improve and you'll shoot and enjoy it more.
 
Posts: 617 | Location: VA | Registered: July 02, 2006Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
SIGforum's Official
Hypochondriac
Picture of 220ST
Posted Hide Post
Voting to leave it.
 
Posts: 24908 | Location: Tallahassee, FL. | Registered: November 24, 2002Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
Take it out. The lawyer argument is pure BS assuming you intentionally shot the person. Ayoob and others peddle this crap to make money and sell magazines.

I also don't believe that the HP originally came with a disconnect so in reality you aren't changing anything, just returning it back to the way it was.
 
Posts: 179 | Location: San Diego, CA | Registered: July 08, 2002Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
I'm a lawyer, and mine is out. Of course, I no longer carry it since our policy specifies double action capability. I could see it being an issue if it were an accidental shooting, but if it's a deliberate one, I can't see it getting in front of a jury.
 
Posts: 517 | Location: Sanford, FL | Registered: November 01, 2007Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
 Previous Topic | Next Topic powered by eve community Page 1 2 3  

Closed Topic Closed

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  SIG Pistols    Browning Hi Power: Remove magazine disconnect or leave as is?

© SIGforum 2008