SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  Ammunition    Why no love for the fo-tay?
Page 1 2 3 

Moderators: lbj, LDD, parabellum
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
  Login/Join 
Member
Picture of jaaron11
Posted
Link

In reading the above post, I couldn't help but notice the number of responders who have no use for or love of the .40 S&W. Why? Granted, it's not the ideal range load, but it's a great SD round IMHO. Maybe it doesn't have the power of the .45, but it's got a lot of juice and generally comes in fairly high capacity guns.

I'm not interested in hearing why the 9mm or .45 ACP or .357 SIG are superior. I just want to know what's wrong with the fo-tay.


J


"But he was pierced for our transgressions, he was crushed for our iniquities; the punishment that brought us peace was upon him, and by his wounds we are healed." - Isaiah 53:5
 
Posts: 313 | Location: Central AL | Registered: May 08, 2009Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of flesheatingvirus
Posted Hide Post
It's bo-ring.


--- Grayguns P226R .357SIG -- P226 W.German -- 590A1 -- M4gery -- Ruger Mark III ---

-- Fear is the mind-killer. Fear is the little-death that brings total obliteration. I will face my fear. I will permit it to pass over me and through me. And when it has gone past me I will turn the inner eye to see its path. Where the fear has gone there will be nothing. Only I will remain. --
 
Posts: 5975 | Location: Magdalena/Socorro, NM | Registered: October 14, 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Official forum
SIG Pro
enthusiast
Picture of stickman428
Posted Hide Post
When I first got into shooting I did not care for 40S&W but it has grown on me. I used to think it was too snappy but in the right pistol (229 or P2000) it is very accurate and easy to control.

The main reason I am liking 40S&W right now is that it is basically the only handgun caliber available at my local wally world and favorite range.

I have been getting the urge to buy another Glock lately and I am considering buying a Glock 20 SF and picking up a Barsto 40S&W conversion barrel for more affordable shooting.


~~~GO COLTS~~~
 
Posts: 5188 | Location: SE Virginia | Registered: April 16, 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of StorminNormin
Posted Hide Post
In my opinion, the .40 is a very reliable round overall. Yes both the 9mm and .45 have benefits, but the .40 is consistent with accuracy and penetration. I did just recently change though to .357 Sig for my carry gun. I still have love for the .40.
 
Posts: 1123 | Location: Austin, TX | Registered: July 07, 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Freethinker
Picture of sigfreund
Posted Hide Post
For me, the 40 S&W is a very close second choice as a defensive round right after the 357 SIG.

Back before the 40 was introduced and the 9mm Parabellum and the 45 ACP were the only serious contenders as autoloading pistol cartridges to rely upon for serious purposes, my choice was the 9mm. When the 40 came along with much greater magazine capacity (remember that virtually all 45 magazines were limited to seven rounds in those days) and decent velocity, I took to it instantly.

I don't have any hard data myself, but I'd bet a dollar that the 40 S&W is the most common cartridge used by law enforcement agencies. That's hardly "no love."




“Most men … can seldom accept the simplest and most obvious truth if it … would oblige them to admit the falsity of conclusions … which they have woven, thread by thread, into the fabrics of their lives.”
— Leo Tolstoy
 
Posts: 20767 | Location: 10,150 Feet Above Sea Level In Colorado | Registered: April 04, 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of grumpy1
Posted Hide Post
I like the nice holes it leaves in a paper target even with the cheap FMJ stuff because of the blunt nose and my local Walmarts are loaded with .40 Federal at 13.96 a box though I bought a ton at 12.47 a box. In a P229 it all shoots well.
 
Posts: 296 | Location: Northern Illinois | Registered: March 20, 2009Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
MWC
Misanthropic Philanthrope
Picture of MWC
Posted Hide Post
It is the answer to a question that was never asked. It is the solution to a problem that never existed. It is a compromise between two calibers that already perform well and the downloading of a third caliber to make it controllable for the tender-handed weenies. It is marketing hyperbole at its grandest.


_____________________________



Originally posted by Psychobastard:
Well, we "gave them democracy"... not unlike giving a monkey a loaded gun.

 
Posts: 5956 | Registered: June 14, 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of Jumper
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by MWC:
It is the answer to a question that was never asked. It is the solution to a problem that never existed. It is a compromise between two calibers that already perform well and the downloading of a third caliber to make it controllable for the tender-handed weenies. It is marketing hyperbole at its grandest.


Agreed. Good round, but what's the point these days with all the great 9mm loadings? My first two pistols were .40s. I don't miss them one bit, because the platforms were better in 9mm.
 
Posts: 1089 | Location: Dallas TX | Registered: December 14, 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of Deadman
Posted Hide Post
except for a brief foray in 9mm out of a Beretta 9 when I started shooting, I have always been a .45 guy. P 220's and 1911's.

I got into the .40 for a different reason.
I always wanted a Browning High Power and to me that pistol just makes more sense in a .40 over a 9mm.

didn't hurt I had 2000 rnds of .40 including Ranger that my ole lady made obsolete when selling her HK to fund a 1911.

the more I shoot it, the more I like it.
.40 short and weak. I don't think so.

and the ammunition is a lot easier to find than .357 Sig or 10mm for a " tender handed weinie " like me.
( asshole )


cold on ice it's a Deadman's touch
 
Posts: 712 | Location: Dark Side of the Moon | Registered: November 23, 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
MWC
Misanthropic Philanthrope
Picture of MWC
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Deadman:
.40 short and weak. I don't think so.

and the ammunition is a lot easier to find than .357 Sig or 10mm for a " tender handed weinie " like me.
( asshole )

The history of your .40 S&W in part stems from shooters unable to handle the recoil of the 10 mm load. (asshole)


_____________________________



Originally posted by Psychobastard:
Well, we "gave them democracy"... not unlike giving a monkey a loaded gun.

 
Posts: 5956 | Registered: June 14, 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of markstempski
Posted Hide Post
So I can easily and safely load my 40s to beat 45s in terms of energy. 45s are by their very design a low pressure proposition. I can carry easily 5 or 6 more rounds of 40s than 45s in a mag and have much better ballistics than a 9mm. No problem to make 40s mushroom the same superior bullet technology that aid the 9 and the 45 are available in the 40. I do wish there were more firearms available in 10mm most notably a Sig. My dies and bullets would work just fine for 10mm, where is that Sig in 10mm?


Mundus Vult Decipi
 
Posts: 547 | Location: Duvall WA, USA | Registered: February 08, 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of Deadman
Posted Hide Post
MWC:
" The history of your .40 S&W in part stems from shooters unable to handle the recoil of the 10 mm load. (asshole) "

no shit, really ?

so if someone can't handle it their a weinie...?

like I said, don't own one. couldn't find ammo...
fun to shoot, but why ?
cut the belly bumpin...


cold on ice it's a Deadman's touch
 
Posts: 712 | Location: Dark Side of the Moon | Registered: November 23, 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by markstempski:
So I can easily and safely load my 40s to beat 45s in terms of energy. 45s are by their very design a low pressure proposition. I can carry easily 5 or 6 more rounds of 40s than 45s in a mag and have much better ballistics than a 9mm. No problem to make 40s mushroom the same superior bullet technology that aid the 9 and the 45 are available in the 40. I do wish there were more firearms available in 10mm most notably a Sig. My dies and bullets would work just fine for 10mm, where is that Sig in 10mm?


So what .40 caliber pistol are you carrying that has 5 or 6 more rounds than my HK USPf 45 with 12 in the mag and 1 in the chamber?
 
Posts: 3373 | Location: Northwest Indiana | Registered: August 15, 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
sdf
"Member"
Picture of sdf
Posted Hide Post
I officially learned to shoot on .40 and the first two guns I purchased new were .40. I've since figured out there's no need for a caliber that doesn't do anything the 9mm or .45 can't.

No thanks.

Now 10mm...
 
Posts: 5577 | Location: Nevada | Registered: April 04, 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
MWC
Misanthropic Philanthrope
Picture of MWC
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Deadman:
MWC:
" The history of your .40 S&W in part stems from shooters unable to handle the recoil of the 10 mm load. (asshole) "

no shit, really ?

so if someone can't handle it their a weinie...?

like I said, don't own one. couldn't find ammo...
fun to shoot, but why ?
cut the belly bumpin...

No need to get your panties in a bunch, Deadman. Shit, you'd think I insulted your mother. Roll Eyes


_____________________________



Originally posted by Psychobastard:
Well, we "gave them democracy"... not unlike giving a monkey a loaded gun.

 
Posts: 5956 | Registered: June 14, 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Sigforum K9 handler
Picture of jljones
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by sigfreund:
For me, the 40 S&W is a very close second choice as a defensive round right after the 357 SIG.

Back before the 40 was introduced and the 9mm Parabellum and the 45 ACP were the only serious contenders as autoloading pistol cartridges to rely upon for serious purposes, my choice was the 9mm. When the 40 came along with much greater magazine capacity (remember that virtually all 45 magazines were limited to seven rounds in those days) and decent velocity, I took to it instantly.

I don't have any hard data myself, but I'd bet a dollar that the 40 S&W is the most common cartridge used by law enforcement agencies. That's hardly "no love."


+1.


_______________________________________________________________________
Upcoming GGI classes

www.grayguns.com

Want free GGI training? Host a GGI class in 2010 and your tuition is free.
 
Posts: 10680 | Location: Randy said what? | Registered: September 12, 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of markstempski
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Ogie:
quote:
Originally posted by markstempski:
So I can easily and safely load my 40s to beat 45s in terms of energy. 45s are by their very design a low pressure proposition. I can carry easily 5 or 6 more rounds of 40s than 45s in a mag and have much better ballistics than a 9mm. No problem to make 40s mushroom the same superior bullet technology that aid the 9 and the 45 are available in the 40. I do wish there were more firearms available in 10mm most notably a Sig. My dies and bullets would work just fine for 10mm, where is that Sig in 10mm?


So what .40 caliber pistol are you carrying that has 5 or 6 more rounds than my HK USPf 45 with 12 in the mag and 1 in the chamber?


Whatta putz. I was obviously speaking of single stack 1911 types that are out there in much greater number than your H and K
But OK, you win my 14 rounds +1 in my 229 is only 2 more. Oh and I forgot the Paras too.


Mundus Vult Decipi
 
Posts: 547 | Location: Duvall WA, USA | Registered: February 08, 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by markstempski:
quote:
Originally posted by Ogie:
quote:
Originally posted by markstempski:
So I can easily and safely load my 40s to beat 45s in terms of energy. 45s are by their very design a low pressure proposition. I can carry easily 5 or 6 more rounds of 40s than 45s in a mag and have much better ballistics than a 9mm. No problem to make 40s mushroom the same superior bullet technology that aid the 9 and the 45 are available in the 40. I do wish there were more firearms available in 10mm most notably a Sig. My dies and bullets would work just fine for 10mm, where is that Sig in 10mm?


So what .40 caliber pistol are you carrying that has 5 or 6 more rounds than my HK USPf 45 with 12 in the mag and 1 in the chamber?


Whatta putz. I was obviously speaking of single stack 1911 types that are out there in much greater number than your H and K
But OK, you win my 14 rounds +1 in my 229 is only 2 more. Oh and I forgot the Paras too.


In other words, you didn't know what you were talking about. I understand.
 
Posts: 3373 | Location: Northwest Indiana | Registered: August 15, 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of Whtwolf14
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by MWC:
It is the answer to a question that was never asked. It is the solution to a problem that never existed. It is a compromise between two calibers that already perform well and the downloading of a third caliber to make it controllable for the tender-handed weenies. It is marketing hyperbole at its grandest.



Yup!!
 
Posts: 2750 | Location: In a place.. wishing I was in another... | Registered: January 01, 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of CurlyShuffle
Posted Hide Post
I've never owned a .40 or a 9mm. Damn, I must be old and set in my ways. Big Grin


________________________________________________________________
soitenly - nyuk, nyuk, nyuk
 
Posts: 1640 | Location: Down the street | Registered: April 01, 2009Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
  Powered by Eve Community Page 1 2 3  
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  Ammunition    Why no love for the fo-tay?

© SIGforum 2009