SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  Ammunition    Slow and Heavy or Fast and Light?

Moderators: lbj, LDD, parabellum
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
  Login/Join 
Member
Posted
In general, heavier bullets travel slower and lighter bullets travel faster (obviously) for a given caliber. I believe that the loads are developed to keep the pressures within a specific range that is designed into the cartridge. The ballistic data for specific bullets usually show that the energy levels for lighter, faster bullets exceeds that of heavier, slower bullets. I have always been with the school of thought that states "the heavier bullet translates into better stopping power". I have heard stories about light and fast bullets that go all the way through a target (bad guy) but don't stop the threat because the energy was not transfered efficiently. I have also heard the stories about a big, fat, 230gr .45ACP hitting the target in the hand and knocking them down. Now, with the advent of high tech bullets of various weights that reliably expand and transfer their energy at various speeds, does the old school of thought still hold true? Would you now want the bullet with the most muzzle energy (ie lighter, faster)? I reload my own ammo to practice with so it becomes important to choose the weight of the reloads to match the weight of the carry rounds. Any thoughts??
 
Posts: 38 | Registered: September 20, 2009Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Moderator
Picture of Chris Orndorff
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by DozerDog:
Any thoughts??


Yes, but I'll keep them to myself. Good luck!


__________________
Alumnus, Eighth Army and the First Infantry Division

Now an FFL licensee, working on SIGs and other assorted firearms. My email is in my profile.
 
Posts: 7411 | Location: UT | Registered: December 05, 1999Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of fredj338
Posted Hide Post
SOme where between BS & fact lies the truth. Energy numbers mean very little for handgun rounds. The bullets construction has more to do with terminal performance than pure bullet wt. or muzzle vel. The reason high vel. loads typically have more energy is the energy numbers increase exponetially w/ the increase of vel.
LIght & fast can be devistating as long as the bullet is constructed to hold together & reach vitals. Without that, the "energy" is wasted & just causes a surface wound. High vel. bullets that fail to expand can exit & leave small wound channels. This is what causes failure to stop, not wasted energy.
Me, I like middle range bullet wts. going fast. As long as the bullet has enough mass to penetrate, some expansion is good. Forget about being impressed w/ exploding gals of water, a person is not a gal of water. Placement, penetration & expansion in that order.


IF YOU AREN'T HANDLOADING, YOU AREN'T SHOOTING ENOUGH!
 
Posts: 2501 | Location: ca, usa | Registered: February 17, 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by fredj338:
SOme where between BS & fact lies the truth. Energy numbers mean very little for handgun rounds. The bullets construction has more to do with terminal performance than pure bullet wt. or muzzle vel. The reason high vel. loads typically have more energy is the energy numbers increase exponetially w/ the increase of vel.
LIght & fast can be devistating as long as the bullet is constructed to hold together & reach vitals. Without that, the "energy" is wasted & just causes a surface wound. High vel. bullets that fail to expand can exit & leave small wound channels. This is what causes failure to stop, not wasted energy.
Me, I like middle range bullet wts. going fast. As long as the bullet has enough mass to penetrate, some expansion is good. Forget about being impressed w/ exploding gals of water, a person is not a gal of water. Placement, penetration & expansion in that order.


...or a wet phone book...


***************************************
What type of cheese would you like with your whine?
 
Posts: 2130 | Registered: January 09, 2009Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
Doesn't matter. Whichever expands to the largest diameter while penetrating 12-18" is going to be the best bet over-all. Energy and velocity don't mena a darn thing at handgun levels unless you are talking about shooting through a car door, then it matters, but for animals, permanent crush-cavity is THE most predictor of effectiveness for projectiles traveling under 2,000 fps or so.
 
Posts: 147 | Registered: July 21, 2009Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
I posed this same question on KahrTalk and got response from lv2tinker that included the link Best Choice for Self Defense Ammo. Pretty good read with lots of interesting links for further info. Seems to me to be a credible source.
 
Posts: 38 | Registered: September 20, 2009Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
posting without pants
Picture of KevinCW
Posted Hide Post
I prefer on target and reliable.

Caliber doesn't mean shit if you can't hit your target.

Translation, whatever you carry will work if used properly. Get a quality firearm, and get quality training.

Kevin





Karma? Karma is just justice without the satisfaction.
 
Posts: 13980 | Location: IL side of ST Louis | Registered: February 15, 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of PistolPackingParson
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by KevinCW:
...whatever you carry will work if used properly. Get a quality firearm, and get quality training.

Kevin


Except for 25 ACP JHPs. Notoriously bad performing bullet. If you're going for 25, try finding lead ball ammunition.

But I'm in complete agreement on training. With handguns, it's shot placement and psychology more than anything else.


Ecce Quam Bonum
 
Posts: 1695 | Location: The Home of Ares | Registered: August 08, 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
Skip the opionions/editorial pages and go for the bullets that have WORKED on REAL human beings. HST appears to be good, BUT not enough REAL WORLD shootings are in yet to formulate a solid hypothesis. You cannot go wrong with Gold Dots. Personally, I use 115 gr. +p+ because they work. Fed. BPLE, Win. Ranger & Speer. 115 gr. +p+ 9mm have stopped a boatload of bad guys. Wink


Drei SIG 228
 
Posts: 136 | Registered: December 25, 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
This is an argument that will never go away.

I don't know why but people still will spend hours typing about it like they are going to convince someone of something...

IMO be accurate with a reliable handgun. Any of the major manufacturers 'premium' rounds will be about the same as any others for most HD encounters.

209


Amateurs practice until they get it right. Professionals practice until they can't get it wrong.
 
Posts: 2296 | Location: Eastern NC | Registered: September 20, 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of Deadman
Posted Hide Post
location, location, location


cold on ice it's a Deadman's touch
 
Posts: 712 | Location: Dark Side of the Moon | Registered: November 23, 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of murray
Posted Hide Post
I 22lr to the spot you aim is better than an AT4 you miss with.


Murray
"No man is entitled to the blessings of freedom unless he is vigilant in its preservation" General Douglas MacArthur
 
Posts: 4028 | Location: Rochester Area, NY | Registered: October 18, 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
I know a guy that was military, police, and had some other "classified" jobs that would probably be a little unsavory to the general public.

He is now a instructor and consultant to some major police Deps. out west. Out of all the calibers and weights he has tested, his carry ammo of choice is 9mm 147 gr winchester ranger T, and Bonded.

He is one of the reasons the San Jose PD went to this round. He says their record on the street is impeccable.
 
Posts: 54 | Registered: September 28, 2009Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
Both will work fine provided you hit what you need to hit. I generally prefer 230 gr. in .45 and 124 gr. +P in 9mm in that order, both jacketed Gold Dot hollowpoints by Speer.
 
Posts: 3374 | Location: Northwest Indiana | Registered: August 15, 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of CQC.45
Posted Hide Post
How about Heavy and Fast? Cool


______________________________________________________________________
"I like my defensive calibers to start with a 4 and preferably end with a 5"
 
Posts: 998 | Registered: June 12, 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of sigmonkey
Posted Hide Post
I need to practice on hitting BG hands with my big fat 230 gr .45

It's easier when they do the "Jazz Hands" thing...



Wings without Hooters is just chicken.
 
Posts: 3048 | Location: Group W bench | Registered: December 20, 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by CQC.45:
How about Heavy and Fast? Cool


Supersonic telephone poles Wink


Gerry

"Years from now you will be more disappointed by the things that you didn't do than by the ones you did do." - Mark Twain
 
Posts: 10 | Location: Biloxi, Mississippi | Registered: September 11, 2009Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by KevinCW:
I prefer on target and reliable.

Caliber doesn't mean shit if you can't hit your target.

Translation, whatever you carry will work if used properly. Get a quality firearm, and get quality training.

Kevin


Preach it brother!


=======================
Certifed Sig Classic Pistol Armorer

USMC: 1975-1979

Lawdog: 1980 to ???

Soldier of Christ: January 2000 to Eternity

Sheepdog who has found the Shepherd

"But God shows his love for us in that while we were still sinners, Christ died for us."
(Romans 5:8)
 
Posts: 55 | Location: Connecticut | Registered: May 15, 2009Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
  Powered by Eve Community  
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  Ammunition    Slow and Heavy or Fast and Light?

© SIGforum 2009