SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  Ammunition    Rem UMC is nasty!

Moderators: LDD, parabellum
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Rem UMC is nasty! Login/Join 
Member
posted
I bought a 100 rnd pack of Rem UMC 9mm not too long ago. I usually use WWB or Federal but this was on sale. This was the smelliest, nastiest ammo I have ever put through a pistol. I only shot 50 rounds but the residue and soot looked like at least 300 or more rounds had been fired. I don't mind cleaning but this was not fun. Anyone else have problems with this ammo?



"Even if the world were perfect it wouldn't be." ... Yogi Berra
 
Posts: 790 | Location: York County, VA | Registered: August 25, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of jjkroll32
posted Hide Post
Yep, dirty and usually pretty low power even for range plinking ammo.

Haven't bought their stuff in years.


_________________________
An unarmed man can only flee from evil and evil is not overcome by fleeing from it. - Col Jeff Cooper

NRA Life Member

Long Live the Super Thirty-Eight
 
Posts: 10034 | Location: Mid-Michigan | Registered: October 02, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Non-Miscreant
posted Hide Post
In all fairness to Remington, they used to be "top shelf" ammo makers. Among the very best in fact. I'm not sure you can indict all loadings they produce because of one box of economy priced ammo. The next guy along may pay for full priced or even premium SD ammo and get good value. Or not. The same goes for Winchester. At one time they marketed the very best stuff.

But companies change hands. One of the things they pay for is the good name. Then they have fun destroying that image and good will to pick off some quick profits selling sub standard items at top prices. Or during a ammo shortage, they put out what they can and you buy it with confidence. Ill founded confidence.

50 years ago, CCI was considered a Johnny come lately and producer of garbage. It took years and years for them to finally be recognized as a quality product.

Making the situation even worse is that the ammo maker can't control the use of their product. If you're a reloader you know that some loads do really well in rifles and generate immense soot in a revolver. Just 20 short inches of barrel difference and look what happens.

I used to buy Remington golden bullet 22s because in the mid 1960s they were the cats meow. They produced target grade performance in my little Browning rifle. Better at that juncture than the crappy brands like Winchester or CCI. Except times change. A while back I went to a gun counter (admittedly a discounter) and picked up a brick of my formerly preferred ammo. You know, the stuff I could count on. It was both dirty and inaccurate. What happened? Just a few decades, a change in management and maybe ownership.

So my conclusion is simple. Thanks for your report of how that box of ammo worked in your gun. Its how we learn, the school of hard knocks. I wouldn't be expecting the OP to buy any more of it. But in 20 years, that situation may again reverse itself.


Unhappy ammo seeker
 
Posts: 15363 | Location: Kentucky, USA | Registered: February 25, 2001Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Hoping for better pharmaceuticals
posted Hide Post
I'll buy it if an extremely good deal. It is the dirtiest ammo I have ever shot.




Getting shot is no achievement. Hitting your enemy is.
 
Posts: 7626 | Location: Phoenix, Arizona | Registered: April 02, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata  
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  Ammunition    Rem UMC is nasty!

© SIGforum 2017