I know repealing the NFA is Congress' duty, but could the Chief Executive officer direct the agency to hire more workers, streamline the process, and get the wait times down to a month?
Isn't it just a question of organizational inefficiency?
Could he, probably. Alas I suspect that's somewhere in between "fixing rush hour traffic" and "keeping potato chips from breaking in a bag" on his list of stuff to do. Other words, not a chance of it happening
Definitely has better things to do then that, and what happens when the bottle neck clears up ? Mass firings ?! We'll be back down to about 45 days or shorter... shortly. Also there is on the books about how much BATFE is allowed to computerized... Not much!
Technically yes, the President is the Chief Executive and BATFE is within the executive branch, so he can issue such an order.
It gets more complicated from there. More performance usually = more resources = more money.
"More money" can come from two places, internal to the agency, which means redoing the budget; or external to the agency, which usually means getting more money from Congress.
If POTUS doesn't go to Congress for more more money, that means something that's already in the budget will get cut. It's definitely not a deal breaker, but it can be a pain in the ass. Bureaucracies have lots of mice, but only one block of cheese and everyone wants their piece. What program at BATFE would get cut so that more employees could be allocated to the NFA branch?
Not trying to be tin foil hat guy but if there was ever to be a branch to enforce a more rigid gun control set of laws it would be the BATFE. Do we want it bigger and better staffed in the big picture or do we want it small and cumbersome?
The problem is the asinine law itself and not the bureaucracy in place to enforce it.
Maybe the first step should be over the counter purchase like a firearm, 4473 filled out, call made to the wonks in DC. Carry permit to allow the no call feature, take your new muffler home. This is the only way I see this ever happening, too many GDC's in DC.
+1! Even if they had a short wait time for prints if you didn’t have a CCW, but they already have CCW holders fingerprints so this should be an over the counter transaction.... but it would be awesome if they functioned just like a firearm and everyone could just get them over the counter with a simple 4473.
Except that the finger prints for CCW/CPL holders is in a state database/system. Now your asking for a state and federal system to communicate and be productive...................................... I think we all know the outcome of that endeavor.
|I Am The Walrus|
With the $200 fee, are they (government) actually making money off these?
When the NFA was initiated in 1934, that $200 fee likely provided some amount of profit per transaction. Fast forward 84 years -- not so much.
A clerk spends 5 minutes reviewing the form for any reason to reject it. Otherwise it gets a stamp and gets mailed to you or your FFL. $200 for that?
|Music's over turn |
out the lights
I am sure they were hoping the $200 tax stamp would keep people from wanting NFA items in 1934. A quick inflation calculator shows that would be $3600 in todays world. How many of us could afford that tax stamp?This message has been edited. Last edited by: David W,
Rather fail with honor than succeed by fraud. -Sophocles
|A man of few words|
I posted the following on another board a couple of years ago when a similar thread was going there. I think it would solve all of the problems associated with buying in to the NFA world. The government gives up no money (we all know that they never will anyway), and we get the benefits of no wait and more R&D/better products coming out with increased revenue/sales.
Do you have any data that says that's how long it takes?
I wish they would handle it like a C&R FFL. Make a person apply every few years and transfer at will while licensed. Hell, charge me the $200...I don't care that much. Then, instead of having tens of thousands of checks to run constantly, you process new and renewal licenses only. The benefit to ATF for those of us that buy a bunch of NFA stuff would be immediate and obvious.
|Bought a 239 magazine for $10, got banned for free.|
Very good idea.
An idea is just that, an idea. Making it easy as buying a Title 1 gun would require Congress to repeal the NFA. If Congress can’t get it together for the HPA, what are the chances for repealing the NFA? No chance.
|Powered by Social Strata|