Wonder who the "Soros-like" multi-billionaire is the Breitbart editor's book identifies as the force behind the progressive libtard scenes. Bill Gates the turd?

quote:

Originally posted by bald1:
Wonder who the "Soros-like" multi-billionaire is the Breitbart editor's book identifies as the force behind the progressive libtard scenes. Bill Gates the turd?

Guessing it could be Bezos since he owns the Washington Post and Amazon has benefitted immensely from the lockdowns. Close the stores first, then destroy and loot the remaining stores so that they don't reopen. Use social justice and racial equity to distract everyone from the oligarchy of rich tech billionaires trying to reshape the world to their benefit.

quote:

Originally posted by bald1:
Wonder who the "Soros-like" multi-billionaire is the Breitbart editor's book identifies as the force behind the progressive libtard scenes. Bill Gates the turd?

There's so many of them anymore.

quote:

Originally posted by Lefty Sig:

quote:

Originally posted by bald1:
Wonder who the "Soros-like" multi-billionaire is the Breitbart editor's book identifies as the force behind the progressive libtard scenes. Bill Gates the turd?

Guessing it could be Bezos since he owns the Washington Post and Amazon has benefitted immensely from the lockdowns. Close the stores first, then destroy and loot the remaining stores so that they don't reopen. Use social justice and racial equity to distract everyone from the oligarchy of rich tech billionaires trying to reshape the world to their benefit.

Supposedly the individual hides his manipulation under the guise of a philanthropist. Don't think Bezos is known for his largesse.

Bloomie? Buffet? They both like to get their proverbial fingers into things...

What about Richard Branson? He's big into philanthropy, worth 6.2 billion, and is just old enough to be a bonafide hippie.

I know, a drop in the bucket compared to Gates' 133B. It probably is Bill Gates.

This message has been edited. Last edited by: 83v45magna,

Why is the identity of this billionaire a secret? Its meaningless to me unless I know who it is.

quote:

Originally posted by sigspecops:
Why is the identity of this billionaire a secret?

I agree. Guess we'll have to wait until the book is released and folks post reviews identifying him.

quote:

Originally posted by sdy:
It is no longer the Supreme Court, it is the "Supreme Cowards".

Yes, either cowardice or complicity. Roberts has given every indication he is compromised since his inexplicable, illogical ruling on Obamacare.



.

Senator Cruz was fired up at CPAC. He'll have a sore throat after all the shouting. Is President Trump going to speak? Thought I heard so.

quote:

Originally posted by David Lee:
Senator Cruz was fired up at CPAC. He'll have a sore throat after all the shouting. Is President Trump going to speak? Thought I heard so.

Sunday.

Para - How about a 'Trump Office of the President : Year I' ?

Or 'Trump Presidency in Exile : Year I' ???

Year IV is done with. Just a thought.

quote:

Originally posted by icom706:

Year IV is done with. Just a thought.

No it isn't. Shut up.

OK, as I understand it, the Manhattan DA and others have the green light to pore over his tax returns. What do they expect to find? Ooh, he claimed some office supplies as a business expense and lost the receipt? Ill-gotten gains from criminal activity aren't going to be shown on a tax return, for Christ's sake.

This message has been edited. Last edited by: egregore,

The tax returns are probably being requested in the hopes of finding something embarrassing as much as anything else. It’s like when Richard Nixon’s leaked return showed a huge deduction for his papers that he donated to a library.

But a return could nevertheless show something that amounted to criminal activity. If I claim a charitable deduction to the Home for Unwed Poodles and that charity does not exist, I believe that would be a criminal offense.

quote:

If I claim a charitable deduction to the Home for Unwed Poodles and that charity does not exist, I believe that would be a criminal offense.

It sure is, but the IRS prosecutes that, not your local government.

quote:

Originally posted by a1abdj:
It sure is, but the IRS prosecutes that, not your local government.

I was not about to get into the legal labyrinth of who has or does not have jurisdiction over the possible offenses; I said nothing about that question.
But now that you bring it up, does he not have properties and business dealings in New York that would have had tax implications? The articles I skimmed indicate that some of the questions relate to property taxes in the state. Are you saying that only Federal prosecutors would have jurisdiction over such matters?

In any event, my point was that criminal activity can indeed be discovered by reviewing tax returns. Some people here don’t seem to understand that obvious fact even though it could have implications for their own returns.

It’s always been my impression it’s as much a chance to embarrass him by finding his net worth is not what he claims.

Seems to me that net worth can vary from day to day simply because the market values may/do change. Especially in things like stocks and bonds. Does not mean that legal, or financial, actions must be undertaken in response to those changes.

What the crooked dems want is to show that the President is a rich guy "not paying his fair share"; never mind that his business legally took advantage of existing tax loopholes that any American has the ability to do. The media will be instructed to roast him for paying pennies while Americans pay soooo much more.