quote:

What unites these leaders, beyond a willingness to embrace nationalism, is the intention to break some China. Even here, the grand-strategies differ. American policymakers broadly want India to be more closely aligned to the Quad, a semi-formal geopolitical alignment between the Asian liberal democracies encircling China, comprising of Japan, Australia, India, and the United States. Washington is grappling to find the best containment strategy for China, which might lead to some security buck-passing to regional great powers, facilitating an Asian alliance system to counter the rise of a new hegemon. New Delhi, however, wants to continue the tried and tested policy of hedging, equidistant from both superpowers, fiercely independent of ideological interference in sovereign affairs.

India is wary of China’s rise, yet keenly aware that it is the only rival sharing a land border with the People’s Republic. Any formal band-wagoning or alliance with the US, would make India a frontier state, like Taiwan — a scenario strategists in New Delhi want to avoid. The dynamics of great power rivalry still apply in the 21st century.

The possibilities of an Indo-US grand alliance are, as Trump might say, ‘yuge’ — if America is willing to ignore concerns about Modi’s politics, and accept that India will remain a socially-conservative and majoritarian, but democratic, great power.

quote:

...ABC News has suspended correspondent Wright “for unguarded remarks..."

quote:

Originally posted by stoic-one:

quote:

...ABC News has suspended correspondent Wright “for unguarded remarks..."

Oops, got caught being honest, so sad, too bad.

quote:

FOXNEWS.COM: Court hands Trump win in sanctuary city fight, says administration can deny grant money

A federal appeals court on Wednesday handed a major win to the Trump administration in its fight against “sanctuary” jurisdictions, ruling that it can deny grant money to states that refuse to cooperate with federal immigration authorities.

The 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals in New York overturned a lower court ruling that stopped the administration’s 2017 move to withhold grant money from the Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program, which dispenses over $250 million a year to state and local criminal justice efforts.

“Today’s decision rightfully recognizes the lawful authority of the Attorney General to ensure that Department of Justice grant recipients are not at the same time thwarting federal law enforcement priorities,” a DOJ spokesman said in a statement. “The grant conditions here require states and cities that receive DOJ grants to share information about criminals in custody. The federal government uses this information to enforce national immigration laws--policies supported by successive Democrat and Republican administrations.”

“All Americans will benefit from increased public safety as this Administration is able to implement its lawful immigration and public safety policies,” the statement said.

The latest decision conflicts with rulings from other appeals courts across the country concerning sanctuary policies, indicating a Supreme Court review is ultimately likely.

New York City and liberal states including New York, Washington, Massachusetts and Connecticut sued the government, and the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York backed them — ordering the money be released and stopping the government from putting immigration-related conditions on grants.

But the appeals court ruled that it “cannot agree that the federal government must be enjoined from imposing the challenged conditions on the federal grants here at issue.”

“These conditions help the federal government enforce national immigration laws and policies supported by successive Democratic and Republican administrations,” the court ruled. “But more to the authorization point, they ensure that applicants satisfy particular statutory grant requirements imposed by Congress and subject to Attorney General oversight.”

It also disagreed with the district court’s claim that the conditions intrude on powers reserved only to states, noting that in immigration policy the Supreme Court has found that the federal government maintains “broad” and “preeminent” power.
ICE cracks down on NYC's sanctuary city policiesVideo

The ruling marks a key win for the administration in its efforts to crack down on the continued use of “sanctuary” policies that limit local law enforcement cooperation with federal immigration authorities in order to shield illegal immigrants from deportation.

Such policies generally forbid local law enforcement from honoring detainers -- requests from Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) that they be alerted to of an illegal immigrant’s release from custody so they can be be picked up by ICE and put through deportation proceedings.

Proponents of the policies claim it makes cities safer because it encourages illegal immigrants to cooperate with police without fear of deportation. But the Trump administration has been relentlessly pushing back by highlighting cases in which criminals are released onto the streets only to re-offend.

It has also deployed a series of measures to combat the practice, including deploying elite Border Patrol agents to sanctuary cities to help ICE track down and detain illegal immigrants.

The Justice Department recently announced a slew of measures, and President Trump has called on Congress to pass legislation that would allow victims of crimes committed by illegal immigrants to sue sanctuary cities and states.

“Not one more American life should be stolen by sanctuary cities; they’re all over the place and a lot of people don’t want them,” Trump said at the State of the Union address this month.

quote:

Originally posted by PASig:
This should pretty entertaining to watch:

6 PM ET tonight, Wed 2/26:

Trump To Hold News Conference At 6pmET To Dispel Media's "Fake News, Panicking" Over Virus Outbreak