SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    Peruta Review Denied
Page 1 2 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Peruta Review Denied Login/Join 
I believe in the
principle of
Due Process
Picture of JALLEN
posted
Supreme Court declined to review the Peruta case out of San Diego, dealing with concealed carry rules. Thomas and Gorsuch dissent.

Link




Luckily, I have enough willpower to control the driving ambition that rages within me.

When you had the votes, we did things your way. Now, we have the votes and you will be doing things our way. This lesson in political reality from Lyndon B. Johnson

"Some things are apparent. Where government moves in, community retreats, civil society disintegrates and our ability to control our own destiny atrophies. The result is: families under siege; war in the streets; unapologetic expropriation of property; the precipitous decline of the rule of law; the rapid rise of corruption; the loss of civility and the triumph of deceit. The result is a debased, debauched culture which finds moral depravity entertaining and virtue contemptible." - Justice Janice Rogers Brown
 
Posts: 48369 | Location: Texas hill country | Registered: July 04, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Get Off My Lawn
Picture of oddball
posted Hide Post
Peruta is done. Not surprising.



"I’m not going to read Time Magazine, I’m not going to read Newsweek, I’m not going to read any of these magazines; I mean, because they have too much to lose by printing the truth"- Bob Dylan, 1965
 
Posts: 16693 | Location: Texas | Registered: May 13, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
10mm is The
Boom of Doom
Picture of Fenris
posted Hide Post
Damn.




The budget should be balanced, the Treasury should be refilled, public debt should be reduced, the arrogance of officialdom should be tempered and controlled, and the assistance to foreign lands should be curtailed lest Rome become bankrupt. People again must learn to work, instead of living on public assistance. ~ Cicero 55 BC

The Dhimocrats love America like ticks love a hound.
 
Posts: 17460 | Location: Northern Virginia | Registered: November 08, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Ammoholic
posted Hide Post
Not happy that it wasn't resolved "the right way," I guess I just have to be happy that it wasn't resolved the wrong way...
 
Posts: 6919 | Location: Lost, but making time. | Registered: February 23, 2011Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of downtownv
posted Hide Post
Need one or two SCOTUS Changes, God willing.


_________________________

https://www.teampython.com


 
Posts: 8353 | Location: 18 miles long, 6 Miles at Sea | Registered: January 22, 2012Reply With QuoteReport This Post
I believe in the
principle of
Due Process
Picture of JALLEN
posted Hide Post
You can read Justice Thomas's view starting on page 30 of the link above.




Luckily, I have enough willpower to control the driving ambition that rages within me.

When you had the votes, we did things your way. Now, we have the votes and you will be doing things our way. This lesson in political reality from Lyndon B. Johnson

"Some things are apparent. Where government moves in, community retreats, civil society disintegrates and our ability to control our own destiny atrophies. The result is: families under siege; war in the streets; unapologetic expropriation of property; the precipitous decline of the rule of law; the rapid rise of corruption; the loss of civility and the triumph of deceit. The result is a debased, debauched culture which finds moral depravity entertaining and virtue contemptible." - Justice Janice Rogers Brown
 
Posts: 48369 | Location: Texas hill country | Registered: July 04, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
 
Posts: 1168 | Registered: July 06, 2016Reply With QuoteReport This Post
eh-TEE-oh-clez
Picture of Aeteocles
posted Hide Post
Sigh.
 
Posts: 13047 | Location: Orange County, California | Registered: May 19, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Baroque Bloke
Picture of Pipe Smoker
posted Hide Post
Damn.



Serious about crackers
 
Posts: 8945 | Location: San Diego | Registered: July 26, 2014Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of TigerDore
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by downtownv:
Need one or two SCOTUS Changes, God willing.

Based on this, we need at least 3. Pathetic.



.
 
Posts: 8621 | Registered: September 26, 2013Reply With QuoteReport This Post
goodheart
Picture of sjtill
posted Hide Post
What Pipe Smoker said.
I note that the Originalist Twins, Thomas and Gorsuch, were on the "right" side.


_________________________
“ What all the wise men promised has not happened, and what all the damned fools said would happen has come to pass.”— Lord Melbourne
 
Posts: 18058 | Location: One hop from Paradise | Registered: July 27, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Lost Allman Brother
Picture of S600MBUSA
posted Hide Post
It only requires 4 justices to agree to grant certiorari (hear a case), all done behind closed doors. You never know which one voted which way unless a justice or justices publish a dissent or concurrence.

In this case we know at least Thomas and Gorsuch voted for cert. I'd guess Alito did as well, but that's obviously speculation. Not being able to get a 4th cert vote from Roberts or Kennedy is interesting (and disappointing).

Looking forward to reading this dissent by my favorite living member of The Supremes.


_________________________
Their system of ethics, which regards treachery and violence as virtues rather than vices, has produced a code of honour so strange and inconsistent, that it is incomprehensible to a logical mind.

-Winston Churchill, writing of the Pashtun
 
Posts: 3989 | Location: Holly Springs/Canton, GA | Registered: November 02, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Political Cynic
Picture of nhtagmember
posted Hide Post
once again I think that we've been let down by Roberts

I was hoping this would have gone all the way

a sad day for the citizens of California

apparently they're nothing more than subjects of the State



[B] Against ALL enemies, foreign and DOMESTIC


 
Posts: 53176 | Location: Tucson Arizona | Registered: January 16, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Live Slow,
Die Whenever
Picture of medic451
posted Hide Post
I cant believe we couldnt even get 4 justices on board. This is such bullshit, the gun owners of CA have worked so hard for this, and once again we got the rug pulled out from under us.



"I won't be wronged, I won't be insulted, and I won't be laid a hand on. I don't do these things to other people and I require the same from them."
- John Wayne in "The Shootist"
 
Posts: 3446 | Location: California | Registered: May 31, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Political Cynic
Picture of nhtagmember
posted Hide Post
I thought that once Gorsuch came on board, this would have been a slam dunk for the citizens

very disappointed



[B] Against ALL enemies, foreign and DOMESTIC


 
Posts: 53176 | Location: Tucson Arizona | Registered: January 16, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Now in Florida
Picture of ChicagoSigMan
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by S600MBUSA:
It only requires 4 justices to agree to grant certiorari (hear a case), all done behind closed doors. You never know which one voted which way unless a justice or justices publish a dissent or concurrence.

In this case we know at least Thomas and Gorsuch voted for cert. I'd guess Alito did as well, but that's obviously speculation. Not being able to get a 4th cert vote from Roberts or Kennedy is interesting (and disappointing).

Looking forward to reading this dissent by my favorite living member of The Supremes.


It's a better bet that they had 4 votes for cert (Thomas, Gorsuch, Alito and Roberts) but not 5 votes to reverse the 9th Cir. Kennedy probably indicated he wouldn't vote to overturn, so rather than take the case and set a SCOTUS precedent against the 2nd Amendment, they preferred to let the appellate court ruling stand until such time as they have the votes to overturn it. Thanks, Justice Kennedy. Screwed us again. At least, that's how I would wager it went down.
 
Posts: 6063 | Location: FL | Registered: March 09, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Baroque Bloke
Picture of Pipe Smoker
posted Hide Post
One bright spot: Gorsuch is proving to be the kind of guy that we hoped for. Not another David Souter.



Serious about crackers
 
Posts: 8945 | Location: San Diego | Registered: July 26, 2014Reply With QuoteReport This Post
10mm is The
Boom of Doom
Picture of Fenris
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Pipe Smoker:
One bright spot: Gorsuch is proving to be the kind of guy that we hoped for. Not another David Souter.

Maybe Souter will retire to some leftist paradise (like Venezuela) with Ginsburg.




The budget should be balanced, the Treasury should be refilled, public debt should be reduced, the arrogance of officialdom should be tempered and controlled, and the assistance to foreign lands should be curtailed lest Rome become bankrupt. People again must learn to work, instead of living on public assistance. ~ Cicero 55 BC

The Dhimocrats love America like ticks love a hound.
 
Posts: 17460 | Location: Northern Virginia | Registered: November 08, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
I believe in the
principle of
Due Process
Picture of JALLEN
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by ChicagoSigMan:
quote:
Originally posted by S600MBUSA:
It only requires 4 justices to agree to grant certiorari (hear a case), all done behind closed doors. You never know which one voted which way unless a justice or justices publish a dissent or concurrence.

In this case we know at least Thomas and Gorsuch voted for cert. I'd guess Alito did as well, but that's obviously speculation. Not being able to get a 4th cert vote from Roberts or Kennedy is interesting (and disappointing).

Looking forward to reading this dissent by my favorite living member of The Supremes.


It's a better bet that they had 4 votes for cert (Thomas, Gorsuch, Alito and Roberts) but not 5 votes to reverse the 9th Cir. Kennedy probably indicated he wouldn't vote to overturn, so rather than take the case and set a SCOTUS precedent against the 2nd Amendment, they preferred to let the appellate court ruling stand until such time as they have the votes to overturn it. Thanks, Justice Kennedy. Screwed us again. At least, that's how I would wager it went down.


So you think each case is decided before it is briefed and argued, based solely on the petitions for certiorari?




Luckily, I have enough willpower to control the driving ambition that rages within me.

When you had the votes, we did things your way. Now, we have the votes and you will be doing things our way. This lesson in political reality from Lyndon B. Johnson

"Some things are apparent. Where government moves in, community retreats, civil society disintegrates and our ability to control our own destiny atrophies. The result is: families under siege; war in the streets; unapologetic expropriation of property; the precipitous decline of the rule of law; the rapid rise of corruption; the loss of civility and the triumph of deceit. The result is a debased, debauched culture which finds moral depravity entertaining and virtue contemptible." - Justice Janice Rogers Brown
 
Posts: 48369 | Location: Texas hill country | Registered: July 04, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
I'm out of the loop since leaving California, and the Calguns site is a mess. What 2nd amendment cases do we have moving forward?
 
Posts: 958 | Registered: October 07, 2013Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2  
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    Peruta Review Denied

© SIGforum 2024