SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    Federal judge rules that MA law against secretly recording Gov Officials at work is unconstitutional.
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Federal judge rules that MA law against secretly recording Gov Officials at work is unconstitutional. Login/Join 
46and2
Oh stewardess,
I speak jive.
Picture of 46and2
posted
In this week's edition of What Good For the Goose:

This was spearheaded by Project Veritas, and is a good thing as long as we're all having to deal with this idea that there's no privacy at all when in public, and the license plate scanners, and the rest of today's surveillance laden war-on-privacy society.

quote:
In the 44-page decision Saris declared that "secret audio recording of government officials, including law enforcement officials, performing their duties in public is protected by the First Amendment, subject only to reasonable time, place and manner restrictions."


I'd like to know more about those pesky "reasonable restrictions".

Local Mass. news source
 
Posts: 25613 | Registered: March 12, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
PD
Leave the gun.
Take the cannoli.
posted Hide Post
Big news around here
 
Posts: 6634 | Location: New England | Registered: January 06, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
bigdeal
Member
Picture of bigdeal
posted Hide Post
Go get 'em Mr. O'Keef. Smile


-----------------------------
Guns are awesome because they shoot solid lead freedom. Every man should have several guns. And several dogs, because a man with a cat is a woman. Kurt Schlichter
 
Posts: 33845 | Location: Orlando, FL | Registered: April 30, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Chris42
Member
posted Hide Post
So this decision is, in fact saying that the First Ammendment supports secret recording of public employees (police, etc.) except under special, specific situations.

Correct?
 
Posts: 2132 | Location: south central Pennsylvania | Registered: November 05, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Perception
Member
Picture of Perception
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Chris42:
So this decision is, in fact saying that the First Ammendment supports secret recording of public employees (police, etc.) except under special, specific situations.

Correct?


That sounds right, although those "reasonable" restrictions might still have to be hashed out in court.



"The people hate the lizards and the lizards rule the people."
"Odd," said Arthur, "I thought you said it was a democracy."
"I did," said Ford, "it is."
"So," said Arthur, hoping he wasn't sounding ridiculously obtuse, "why don't the people get rid of the lizards?"
"It honestly doesn't occur to them. They've all got the vote, so they all pretty much assume that the government they've voted in more or less approximates the government they want."
"You mean they actually vote for the lizards."
"Oh yes," said Ford with a shrug, "of course."
"But," said Arthur, going for the big one again, "why?"
"Because if they didn't vote for a lizard, then the wrong lizard might get in."
 
Posts: 3514 | Location: Two blocks from the Center of the Universe | Registered: December 30, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata  
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    Federal judge rules that MA law against secretly recording Gov Officials at work is unconstitutional.

© SIGforum 2024