Ginsburg is dead. Does everyone agree?
How are things looking for the live judge? I was at the range all morning.
“The fundamental cause of trouble in the world today is that the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt.”
— Bertrand Russell
And hopefully stays that way. Because, well, because.
I lost all my weapons in a boating, umm, accident.
|A Grateful American|
"the meaning of life, is to give life meaning" ✡ I could explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you.
Not just merely dead, but clearly, most sincerely dead.
She had a great opening statement.
"I'm yet another resource-consuming kid in an overpopulated planet raised to an alarming extent by Hollywood and Madison Avenue, poised with my cynical and alienated peers to take over the world when you're old and weak!" - Calvin, "Calvin & Hobbes"
|Get Off My Lawn|
I saw some of today's show, this sums it up well for me.
"I’m not going to read Time Magazine, I’m not going to read Newsweek, I’m not going to read any of these magazines; I mean, because they have too much to lose by printing the truth"- Bob Dylan, 1965
|Gracie Allen is my |
Yes, and that thread should be too.
I surfed through and it seemed to be a royal speechfest today. The one (vaguely) interesting thing that popped up was Kamala Harris' first shot, which was a petty carp at the hearing having brought "together more than 50 people to sit inside a room for hours while our nation faces a deadly airborne virus." What makes that actually (vaguely) interesting? Harris had a number of technical difficulties before she could patch in and participate - which would be an excellent explanation for "bringing 50 people together in a room" in order to ensure the hearing can go forward.
Here's to more sparks being struck as this mess lurches forward!
Very glad for this, Sigfreund.
Facts don't care about your feelings.
"Judge Barrett's credentials are impeccable....."
Her credentials cannot be pecced.
You’re a lying dog-faced pony soldier
|Gracie Allen is my |
They seem to have guns, why wouldn't they have pecs?
Thank you, SigFreund. I suggested this a couple of weeks ago, I believe.
Opening statements were mostly bloviating, but I admit to missing Sen. Ernst’s, my wife said she was excellent.
I did hear the statement by Professor O’Hara, who hired Judge Barrett at Notre Dame law school. It was an enthusiastic “letter of reference”, backed up with evidence of the wide range of areas in which Judge Barrett excels.
I submit for your consideration an excellent article by Andy McCarthy from National Review:
Democrats’ frivolous arguments against Barrett
“We seem to be getting closer and closer to a situation where nobody is responsible for what they did but we are all responsible for what somebody else did.”--Thomas Sowell
So will they be holding hearings again tomorrow? I thought I heard somewhere that they might vote as early as Thursday.
|Muzzle flash |
My understanding is that today's debacle was just "opening statements" in which everyone gets to announce what their stance is. The following gatherings are when the Senators ask questions of the nominee.
Texan by choice, not accident of birth
In the other thread tiwimon said this about Sen Richard Blumenthal, D from CT:
"Its a shame ACB couldn't have responded - "No. Furthermore, How Dare YOU! to have the audacity to ask such a thing, considering how you lied about serving in Vietnam while sitting where you are."
Some members may not recall that "DaNang Dick" flat out lied about his service record while running for the Senate 12 years ago:
"At a ceremony honoring veterans and senior citizens who sent presents to soldiers overseas, Attorney General Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut rose and spoke of an earlier time in his life.
“We have learned something important since the days that I served in Vietnam,” Mr. Blumenthal said to the group gathered in Norwalk in March 2008. “And you exemplify it. Whatever we think about the war, whatever we call it — Afghanistan or Iraq — we owe our military men and women unconditional support.”
There was one problem: Mr. Blumenthal, a Democrat now running for the United States Senate, never served in Vietnam. He obtained at least five military deferments from 1965 to 1970 and took repeated steps that enabled him to avoid going to war, according to records.
The deferments allowed Mr. Blumenthal to complete his studies at Harvard; pursue a graduate fellowship in England; serve as a special assistant to The Washington Post’s publisher, Katharine Graham; and ultimately take a job in the Nixon White House.
In 1970, with his last deferment in jeopardy, he landed a coveted spot in the Marine Reserve, which virtually guaranteed that he would not be sent to Vietnam. He joined a unit in Washington that conducted drills and other exercises and focused on local projects, like fixing a campground and organizing a Toys for Tots drive..."
Complete article from an impeccable (to libs) source:
https://www.nytimes.com/2010/0...al.html?ref=nyregionThis message has been edited. Last edited by: Sigmund,
Can we get this thread title changed to "The Justice Amy Coney Barrett thread."?
|wishing we |
Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) warned during the Supreme Court confirmation hearing on Monday that Judge Amy Coney Barrett would erase “common sense” gun controls if confirmed.
Blumenthal suggested that confirming Barrett would mean adding an “activist judge” to the Supreme Court, thereby endangering “common-sense” gun control around the country
and the problem is ?
Babylon Bee starts strong
Live today as if it may be your last and learn today as if you will live forever
|Tinker Sailor Soldier Pie|
She's very impressive. Her clear explanations to questions and obvious command of the law helps me see why she is referred to as a female Scalia.
Acta Non Verba Trump Stands Alone...but he fights
NRA Life Member (Patron)
God, Family, Guns, Country
"My guns are always loaded."
What whiskey will not cure, there is no cure.
|Powered by Social Strata||Page 1 2 3 4 ... 16|