SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    what do you guys in the USA think of this
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
what do you guys in the USA think of this Login/Join 
Junior Member
posted
Just read this in local paper today and was was wondering what the ''Social Worker in the long black robe'' (Judge) will make of this.

https://www.independent.ie/iri...n-raid-36470904.html

This message has been edited. Last edited by: parabellum,
 
Posts: 2 | Registered: December 07, 2017Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of sgalczyn
posted Hide Post
Welcome to SigForum.....a few words of advice:
1. Read the sticky thread requesting profanity NOT be used in thread titles.
2. Read numerous threads about including a description of your topic...not to rely on clicking a link to find out your point of discussion.


"No matter where you go - there you are"
 
Posts: 4577 | Location: Eastern PA-Berks/Lehigh Valley | Registered: January 03, 2001Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of mikeyspizza
posted Hide Post
Hopefully the judge will tell them to take a hike.

In US, store has duty to maintain reasonably safe premises for customers, and customers have to exercise reasonable caution. These clowns were not customers, and it was after hours. Would a reasonably careful customer in the store during operating hours have noticed the ball buster and avoided it?

Either way, plantiff has to prove negligence beyond a reasonable doubt.
 
Posts: 4010 | Location: North Carolina | Registered: August 16, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Step by step walk the thousand mile road
Picture of Sig2340
posted Hide Post
In a fair number of the United States, all of the criminals could have been shot and killed with zero legal repercussions to the shop owner.

Which is as it should be, worldwide.





Nice is overrated

"It's every freedom-loving individual's duty to lie to the government."
Airsoftguy, June 29, 2018
 
Posts: 31441 | Location: Loudoun County, Virginia | Registered: May 17, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
I believe in the
principle of
Due Process
Picture of JALLEN
posted Hide Post
The duties owed by land occupiers to those entering on the property has been in some flux.

It used to be the duty depended on the status of the entrant, business invitee, license or trespasser. Those distinctions are eroding, but in no case is a land occupier an insurer of the safety of those entering upon the land.

Even under the old rules, a land occupier owed a duty not to trap the trespeasser and had a duty to warn of known dangerous conditions on the land.

So it depends how the perp was injured and by what.

Who knows the rules in Ireland.




Luckily, I have enough willpower to control the driving ambition that rages within me.

When you had the votes, we did things your way. Now, we have the votes and you will be doing things our way. This lesson in political reality from Lyndon B. Johnson

"Some things are apparent. Where government moves in, community retreats, civil society disintegrates and our ability to control our own destiny atrophies. The result is: families under siege; war in the streets; unapologetic expropriation of property; the precipitous decline of the rule of law; the rapid rise of corruption; the loss of civility and the triumph of deceit. The result is a debased, debauched culture which finds moral depravity entertaining and virtue contemptible." - Justice Janice Rogers Brown
 
Posts: 48369 | Location: Texas hill country | Registered: July 04, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Coin Sniper
Picture of Rightwire
posted Hide Post
Criminals suing the victims for injuies happens all the time here. I recall a famous case from a decade ago where a thief somehow managed to lock himself in the garage of a home. He had to exist for a week on what was in the refrigerator in the garage (mostly beer and snacks) until the homeowners returned from their vacation and found him. Although arrested he sued and won

People sue for getting hurt breaking into buildings as well.

I'd love to see Trump pass a Federal Law that prevents people from suing if they are engaged in a criminal act at the time of injury.




Pronoun: His Royal Highness and benevolent Majesty of all he surveys

343 - Never Forget

Its better to be Pavlov's dog than Schrodinger's cat

There are three types of mistakes; Those you learn from, those you suffer from, and those you don't survive.
 
Posts: 37957 | Location: Above the snow line in Michigan | Registered: May 21, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Little ray
of sunshine
Picture of jhe888
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Rightwire:
Criminals suing the victims for injuies happens all the time here. I recall a famous case from a decade ago where a thief somehow managed to lock himself in the garage of a home. He had to exist for a week on what was in the refrigerator in the garage (mostly beer and snacks) until the homeowners returned from their vacation and found him. Although arrested he sued and won

People sue for getting hurt breaking into buildings as well.

I'd love to see Trump pass a Federal Law that prevents people from suing if they are engaged in a criminal act at the time of injury.


I'd sure like to know the cite for that case. It just doesn't sound right (it sounds like a modern myth), or there are facts that your summary leaves out. I don't mean you are misleading us, but that the story as passed along or as summarized isn't accurate.

You can't trap a burglar - dig pits or set out bear traps. But if he gets stuck in a normal garage on his own, I don't see any liability.




The fish is mute, expressionless. The fish doesn't think because the fish knows everything.
 
Posts: 53122 | Location: Texas | Registered: February 10, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Coin Sniper
Picture of Rightwire
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by jhe888:
quote:
Originally posted by Rightwire:
Criminals suing the victims for injuies happens all the time here. I recall a famous case from a decade ago where a thief somehow managed to lock himself in the garage of a home. He had to exist for a week on what was in the refrigerator in the garage (mostly beer and snacks) until the homeowners returned from their vacation and found him. Although arrested he sued and won

People sue for getting hurt breaking into buildings as well.

I'd love to see Trump pass a Federal Law that prevents people from suing if they are engaged in a criminal act at the time of injury.


I'd sure like to know the cite for that case. It just doesn't sound right (it sounds like a modern myth), or there are facts that your summary leaves out. I don't mean you are misleading us, but that the story as passed along or as summarized isn't accurate.

You can't trap a burglar - dig pits or set out bear traps. But if he gets stuck in a normal garage on his own, I don't see any liability.


I apologize for not having the full legal brief Big Grin but it is one of those that sticks in your mind, I believe it was even posted on the forum. Maybe 10 years ago or so?

I can tell you that about once a quarter the local news here has a story about a burgler that gets cut on glass from a window they broke, or fall off their ladder, or through the ceiling then sue the business for their injury. Fortunately the ones that try to steal copper from live circuits seldom survive, but I'm sure their family members go after someone in civil court.




Pronoun: His Royal Highness and benevolent Majesty of all he surveys

343 - Never Forget

Its better to be Pavlov's dog than Schrodinger's cat

There are three types of mistakes; Those you learn from, those you suffer from, and those you don't survive.
 
Posts: 37957 | Location: Above the snow line in Michigan | Registered: May 21, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Little ray
of sunshine
Picture of jhe888
posted Hide Post
I am not picking on you - intruders may sue, but they will recover only very rarely recover. Or more likely, they say they will sue, but don't when they learn about the reality of the law.

Their own bad acts often cut off liability for the premises owner. Unless the owner takes some active step to hurt or entrap the intruder, they shouldn't generally be liable.

These stories get attention because they generate outrage, so the press covers them. The reporter doesn't come back a month later and report that no suit got filed. Or nine months later, and report that the court poured the plaintiff out.

I bet not many actually get filed, because those plaintiffs will need contingent-fee representation, and lawyers aren't stupid - they know there isn't money in most of them. When they do get filed, I bet some significant fraction are losers. Would you want to try that case to a jury as a plaintiff? Juries are not sympathetic to burglars.

I think this is a much smaller number of events than you imagine.




The fish is mute, expressionless. The fish doesn't think because the fish knows everything.
 
Posts: 53122 | Location: Texas | Registered: February 10, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Dinosaur
Picture of P210
posted Hide Post
If you take a moment to google burglar trapped in garage sues you will find it and the consensus is that it’s an urban legend that never actually occurred.
 
Posts: 6956 | Location: 96753 | Registered: December 15, 1999Reply With QuoteReport This Post
I believe in the
principle of
Due Process
Picture of JALLEN
posted Hide Post
The case in the case books when I was in law school was the farmer who tired of having his unoccupied farmhouse broken into and looted, so he rigged a shotgun to go off when the front door was opened. Soon enough a robber was severely wounded opening the front door, lost his legs, IIRC, and ended up owning the farm.

You can’t rig a trap, etc, use lethal deadly force, etc. on automatic.




Luckily, I have enough willpower to control the driving ambition that rages within me.

When you had the votes, we did things your way. Now, we have the votes and you will be doing things our way. This lesson in political reality from Lyndon B. Johnson

"Some things are apparent. Where government moves in, community retreats, civil society disintegrates and our ability to control our own destiny atrophies. The result is: families under siege; war in the streets; unapologetic expropriation of property; the precipitous decline of the rule of law; the rapid rise of corruption; the loss of civility and the triumph of deceit. The result is a debased, debauched culture which finds moral depravity entertaining and virtue contemptible." - Justice Janice Rogers Brown
 
Posts: 48369 | Location: Texas hill country | Registered: July 04, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata  
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    what do you guys in the USA think of this

© SIGforum 2024