SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    Initiative Petition 42. Assault Weapons ban/OR
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Initiative Petition 42. Assault Weapons ban/OR Login/Join 
Member
Picture of nojoy
posted
https://www.opb.org/news/artic...render-certain-guns/
"proposal would require to register said Assault Weapons, or give them up".
They may get the required signatures, but I don't think it will pass. I'm sure WA is working on a similar initiative.
 
Posts: 1292 | Location: Marysville, WA 98271 | Registered: March 18, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Too old to run,
too mean to quit!
posted Hide Post
It is oregon. What else is there to say?

All those libtards that moved into Oregon and Washington when they decided they could not live with the shit they bred, elected, educated into their kids, are vigorously trying to replicate that which drove them out of Kalifornisatan.

Which seems to be part of Oregon and Washington west of the mountains. Like most of kalifornistan!.

Nothing they do, or say, surprises me anymore.


Elk

There has never been an occasion where a people gave up their weapons in the interest of peace that didn't end in their massacre. (Louis L'Amour)

"To compel a man to furnish contributions of money for the propagation of opinions which he disbelieves and abhors, is sinful and tyrannical. "
-Thomas Jefferson

"America is great because she is good. If America ceases to be good, America will cease to be great." Alexis de Tocqueville

FBHO!!!



The Idaho Elk Hunter
 
Posts: 25642 | Location: Virginia | Registered: December 16, 2001Reply With QuoteReport This Post
delicately calloused
Picture of darthfuster
posted Hide Post
Fascists never stp being fascists even when they call themselves Progressives



You’re a lying dog-faced pony soldier
 
Posts: 29683 | Location: Highland, Ut. | Registered: May 07, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of nojoy
posted Hide Post
"Common sense gun legislation" Roll Eyes
 
Posts: 1292 | Location: Marysville, WA 98271 | Registered: March 18, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Ignored facts
still exist
posted Hide Post
It's bad. registration of most modern rifles and handguns. Also registration of standard capacity mags.

With a fee involved for a Background Check.

Failure to register would be a Felony.

Text of it here: http://oregonvotes.org/irr/2018/042text.pdf


----------------------
Let's Go Brandon!
 
Posts: 10905 | Location: 45 miles from the Pacific Ocean | Registered: February 28, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Old Air Cavalryman
Picture of ARMT Guy
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Elk Hunter:
It is oregon. What else is there to say?

All those libtards that moved into Oregon and Washington when they decided they could not live with the shit they bred, elected, educated into their kids, are vigorously trying to replicate that which drove them out of Kalifornisatan.

Which seems to be part of Oregon and Washington west of the mountains. Like most of kalifornistan!.

Nothing they do, or say, surprises me anymore.


Spot on!

This is why I decided not to settle back in Washington after I retired from the Army back in '13.

It truly is, the Left Coast now. Mad




"Also I heard the voice of the Lord saying who shall I send, and who will go for us? Then said I, here am I, send me."




 
Posts: 7464 | Location: Georgia | Registered: February 19, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Wait, what?
Picture of gearhounds
posted Hide Post
Carbon copy strategy of that shithole Kalifornia. Let’s see how many mass shootings it prevents when law abiding citizens are the only ones that are affected by this legislation, should it somehow pass.




“Remember to get vaccinated or a vaccinated person might get sick from a virus they got vaccinated against because you’re not vaccinated.” - author unknown
 
Posts: 15559 | Location: Martinsburg WV | Registered: April 02, 2011Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Ignored facts
still exist
posted Hide Post
initiative 42 was withdrawn, and replaced by #43, which is very similar.

http://oregonvotes.org/irr/2018/043text.pdf

The only difference I could find is somehow .22 tubular mags are now ok.

I'm not sure what a "B" felony is. By felony never sounds good. Especially when it comes to simply having a 12 round mag in your house.


----------------------
Let's Go Brandon!
 
Posts: 10905 | Location: 45 miles from the Pacific Ocean | Registered: February 28, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Administrator
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by radioman:
I'm not sure what a "B" felony is. By felony never sounds good. Especially when it comes to simply having a 12 round mag in your house.


Class B = Maximum sentence of 10 years. (Class A would have a max sentence of 20 years)

A lot of this bill is anti-gunner pipe dreams--like registering magazines. How is that even possible?

This plan was started by three liberal Portland pastors.

Lot's of shoot-for-the-moon proposals and no support from legislators so far.
 
Posts: 17733 | Registered: August 12, 2000Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by LDD:
quote:
Originally posted by radioman:
I'm not sure what a "B" felony is. By felony never sounds good. Especially when it comes to simply having a 12 round mag in your house.


Class B = Maximum sentence of 10 years. (Class A would have a max sentence of 20 years)

A lot of this bill is anti-gunner pipe dreams--like registering magazines. How is that even possible?

This plan was started by three liberal Portland pastors.

Lot's of shoot-for-the-moon proposals and no support from legislators so far.


Since it is a ballot initiative I don't think it needs any. Just 88,000 signatures and a win on election day. Eek




“People have to really suffer before they can risk doing what they love.” –Chuck Palahnuik

Be harder to kill: https://preparefit.ck.page
 
Posts: 5043 | Location: Oregon | Registered: October 02, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Go ahead punk, make my day
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Strambo:
quote:
Originally posted by LDD:
quote:
Originally posted by radioman:
I'm not sure what a "B" felony is. By felony never sounds good. Especially when it comes to simply having a 12 round mag in your house.


Class B = Maximum sentence of 10 years. (Class A would have a max sentence of 20 years)

A lot of this bill is anti-gunner pipe dreams--like registering magazines. How is that even possible?

This plan was started by three liberal Portland pastors.

Lot's of shoot-for-the-moon proposals and no support from legislators so far.


Since it is a ballot initiative I don't think it needs any. Just 88,000 signatures and a win on election day. Eek
In otherwords, mob rule.
 
Posts: 45798 | Registered: July 12, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Thank you
Very little
Picture of HRK
posted Hide Post
quote:
I'm not sure what a "B" felony is. By felony never sounds good. Especially when it comes to simply having a 12 round mag in your house.


Simply a quick path to gun confiscation and denial of future gun purchases/ownership, if you are a felon you can't own a firearm.

Making thousands of legal owners illegal is a quick way to remove guns...

nothing to do with safety at all.



 
Posts: 23393 | Location: Florida | Registered: November 07, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Administrator
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Strambo:
Since it is a ballot initiative I don't think it needs any. Just 88,000 signatures and a win on
election day. Eek


Correct, but blue politicians would be lining up left and right if they smelled a winner.

The fact that no one is putting their political cred behind this one is telling.

Even if it passes, there are big Constitutional issues. Or. State Shooting Ass'n v. Multnomah Cty., 122 Or. App. 540, 858 P.2d 1315 (1993), in which the OR Court of Appeals said it was ok to ban "Assault Weapons" was decided before District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570, 128 S. Ct. 2783 (2008). The 1993 state case was decided on grounds diametrically opposite to the US Supreme Court's holding in Heller (In Heller, the Supreme Court ruled that the RKBA applied to modern weapons, not simply late 18th century muskets; in the 1993 state ruling, the OR Court of Appeals believed that OR's RKBA was bound to mid-18th century weapons present at the time the OR Constitution was ratified). Ironically, the OR Appeals Court decision references some Supreme Court decision (which doesn't seem to have a citation) that RKBA only protects weapons available at the time the OR Constitution came into effect. If their reference is to the US Supreme Court, then that reasoning has been explicitly overruled.
 
Posts: 17733 | Registered: August 12, 2000Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Ignored facts
still exist
posted Hide Post
Well, it's moving forward, and in the signature collection phase.

https://ballotpedia.org/Oregon...ity_Initiative_(2018)

Now for the next 2 to 3 months we'll have the same set of losers as always bothering everyone to sign the stupid thing.


----------------------
Let's Go Brandon!
 
Posts: 10905 | Location: 45 miles from the Pacific Ocean | Registered: February 28, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Back when I lived in New York everyone was flabbergasted when the 2012 safe act passed, with many similar provisions. Don’t put anything past them. Forever vigilant!
 
Posts: 3287 | Location: Finally free in AZ! | Registered: February 14, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata  
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    Initiative Petition 42. Assault Weapons ban/OR

© SIGforum 2024