|Go ahead punk, make my day|
So I guess the experts here weren't far off.
I'll leave my comments at that, as to not further disparage the guy you used to know - the term friend no longer applies.
Rhino- sad but true. You are absolutely correct.
If you think you can, YOU WILL!!!!!
Thank you for the update, and I'm sorry about your friend. It is hard to ever know the truth about what people do in their private lives. Unfortunately there's not much you can do now.
Write him off, never talk to him again, he will get what he has coming to him in this life or the next.
The family is still friends, part of your church, and part of your community. Hopefully the term friend still applies to them. They will need your, the community's, and the churches help.
Don't know a thing about LDS folks. What happens next? Does she and the family become pariahs or are they helped by the church?
Sic Semper Tyrannis
I speak jive.
Well, damn. Alright then. Sad story all around.
|There is a world elsewhere|
man, give a porn addict the benefit of the doubt and blam, he goes off the deep end.
the issue is that because the dopamine cycle demands novelty to achieve the 'high', if you will, it requires not just more porn, but nastier, kinkier, dirtier, more violent, etc. It is a progressive problem.
good luck to you and his family
A well balanced breakfast being necessary to the start of a healthy day, the right of the people to keep and eat food shall not be infringed.
Well, my apologies to those that saw something that I didn't.
Take comfort in the fact that if you had been right and the others wrong, they would have come back here and admitted their mistakes.
I doubt they feel the need for any apology, though; nothing can diminish that self-righteous glow of being right about someone else’s deficiencies.
“I can’t give you brains, but I can give you a diploma.”
— The Wizard of Oz
Oh snap, damn. That is very disheartening. There are many loosers in this, and the damages will be far reaching.
I re-read the entire thread and I did not see any post that assumed the person must be viewing child porn. The OP came here looking for advice and people gave it to him. One piece of that advice, in this particular instance, was that this man might be watching child porn. Turns out he was. I can't imagine anyone is happy about that fact.
For those who assumed he was not watching child porn, I certainly don't think an apology is owed. You had every right to assume he was not a criminal. People are innocent until proven guilty.
Just because someone opens the OP's eyes to all of the possibilities doesn't mean they want to be right, or are happy to be right.
OK, are we about done here?
"The fact of the matter is that in waging a scorched earth, no-holds barred war of 'resistance' against this administration, it is the Left that is engaged in a systematic shredding of norms and undermining the rule of law" - US Attorney General William Barr, November 15, 2019
I was listening to a Joe Rogan podcast where he interviewed a woman who makes a TON of money humiliating men sexually online. I forget what she called herself... Humiliatrix or something. People pay for bizarre shit.
|Powered by Social Strata||Page 1 2 3 4|