Member
| quote: Originally posted by YooperSigs: StayFrosty: I arrested a number of "not at fault" drivers who were legally drunk, but not otherwise at fault in the crash. And the other parties insurance uses the argument that the drinking driver was not in lawful use of the roadway at the time of the crash and so reduces or negates their liability. And was not at all unusual for me to arrest both drivers out of a crash. And a co-worker once arrested 3 drivers out of the same crash.
Tell me it was a two car accident and I will be impressed
--------------------------
I own a bunch of Sigs with Beavertails...
|
| Posts: 937 | Location: NE Ohio | Registered: November 09, 2012 |
IP
|
|
Internet Guru
| A murder occurred because these scholars cooked up a stupid scheme. It wasn't an act of God. So, who do we blame for this murder? I'm in complete agreement with charging the folks who set these events in motion. It's a really good law. |
| |
thawed out, thrown out
| quote: Originally posted by YooperSigs: StayFrosty: I arrested a number of "not at fault" drivers who were legally drunk, but not otherwise at fault in the crash. And the other parties insurance uses the argument that the drinking driver was not in lawful use of the roadway at the time of the crash and so reduces or negates their liability. And was not at all unusual for me to arrest both drivers out of a crash. And a co-worker once arrested 3 drivers out of the same crash.
Thanks for the insight. I'm not condoning his actions. I'm simply trying to understand how others are charged when involved in a situation where felony, death and 25+ year sentences are being handed out. |
| |