|No double standards|
I have wondered at times if society would be served by having some standardized "honesty" or "integrity" quotient, along with the regular IQ score. I am amazed at how many in my surrounds continue to ignore or swallow blatant lies.
"Liberty lies in the hearts of men and women. When it dies there, no constitution, no law, no court can save it....While it lies there, it needs no constitution, no law, no court to save it"
- Judge Learned Hand, May 1944
|St. Vitus |
Sorry no ghetto lottery.
|Step by step walk the thousand mile road|
There went the cures for cancer, the common cold, and PMS, unlimited free energy for all, faster-than-light travel, and an improvement in the flavor and nutritional content of bacon.
Shot to hell over Charles' inability to go to jail for a little weed.
Nice is overrated
"It's every freedom-loving individual's duty to lie to the government."
Airsoftguy, June 29, 2018
As a local resident, I have observed a lot of the problem is they don't listen to instructions from the LEO's. A lot of our police involved shootings stem from this problem. What is so difficult about standing still, being searched and go to jail if they are carrying illegally. I think a lot of the problem is the feeling they as a minority, have special rules that apply to them. We have allowed the racist card to be played so often, and supported by the liberals, that our laws seem not to apply to them. The result is a segment of our population think they are being picked on every time they break the law we all live by.
So we see on our news broadcasts the gathering of people, lighted candles, balloons and other stuff piled on the sidewalk to attract the TV cameras and the shouts about police misconduct. It follows a script outlined by those who kept fomenting this pot.
"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution" - Abraham Lincoln
"I have been driven many times upon my knees by the overwhelming conviction that I had nowhere else to go" - Abraham Lincoln
I do.........head shots are preferred so momma cant get an open casket ceremony.................
That video needs subtitles.....I don't understand jive
"No matter where you go - there you are"
He got what he asked for.
|Little ray |
Yeah, but some people do believe that shit. These aren't people who ever thought about what an actual gunfight is. They must all think it is Gary Cooper and High Noon - some Lone Ranger action.
"Why'd you shoot him in the back?"
"So we wouldn't roll over and get a chance to shoot me."
The fish is mute, expressionless. The fish doesn't think because the fish knows everything.
|Rule #1: Use enough gun|
What's for lunch?
When a strong man, fully armed, guards his own house, his possessions are undisturbed. Luke 11:21
"Every nation in every region now has a decision to make.
Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists." -- George W. Bush
|I have not yet begun |
Van Leek - "His back was to me."
After the game, the King and the pawn go into the same box.
Happy endings. Like them.
NIKE- The Swoosh with a Douche
Hopefully, this shit won't get as much traction as it did with the previous administration.
According to the latest theories on how the use of deadly force should be evaluated afterwards, the end result is more important than what was perceived by the officer(s) at the time and whether or not that perception and response was what a reasonable officer would have done. Examples: How do we know the deceased "victim" wasn't just trying to scare the officers? How do we know the gun could fire? Maybe it was unloaded? Why didn't the officers just shoot the gun out of his hand instead of "shooting to kill"? Why did the officers take them out of the car, when it would have been safer to have just left them inside it?
Thank God SCOTUS has ruled otherwise, but with left leaning "police management" organizations pushing for administrative and legislative "cures" to cops acting reasonably in these kinds of situations, I'm soooooo glad I'm not doing this kind of work anymore.
"I'm not fluent in the language of violence, but I know enough to get around in places where it's spoken."
Which was the reason for my comment.
“Most men … can seldom accept the simplest and most obvious truth if it … would oblige them to admit the falsity of conclusions … which they have woven, thread by thread, into the fabrics of their lives.”
— Leo Tolstoy
There seems to be a cultural component:
"Of her sons: “I am trying to teach them to be men, but at the same time I am telling them to back down and not be who they are,” she said of their interactions with law enforcement.
There’s a subtle undertone here — that you should only comply with law enforcement if you believe you’ve done something wrong. Additionally, if you don’t stand up to them, you’re less of a man.
This sort of attitude is making its way into the streets of urban cities — where cops are increasingly being resisted just for doing their jobs. It’s through this resistance that many cases — like Eric Garner’s in New York, or Michael Brown’s in Ferguson — get escalated. In the split-second the officer has to react (in many times to defend himself), often then leads to second-guessing: Was the use of force too much; should more officers been called in; how could the situation been diffused before it even started?"
“If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.”
― Samuel Adams
in today's world, there is a widespread lack of respect towards authority. When you bow up bad things are going to happen to you.
Do I think the Officers here had a reason to shoot? Yes. Do I think they should have shot him in the back while he was firing? Yes. I can not speak to that state's laws, but in Ga all I need is this following information (a) A person is justified in threatening or using force against another when and to the extent that he or she reasonably believes that such threat or force is necessary to defend himself or herself or a third person against such other's imminent use of unlawful force;
So to me they had every reason to believe that SCUMBAG SHOOTING AT THEM was trying to kill them. But maybe I misunderstood every gun class/common sense gun law ever. Dont point at what you wouldn't mind missing
Used guns deserve a home too
He's dead, Jim.
For many of these people it is a lack of common sense reasoning and judgement in these situations. A blatantly dishonest sociopath does not do stuff like this. He is likely to be more than compliant in the hopes the cop will let him off. Honesty and integrity are built into tests that measure personality characteristics.
|Slayer of Agapanthus|
It is likely that decades of criminality and dozens of crimes will now not happen. He brought it on himself. Too bad that his fuck-up relatives cannot be charged as criminal enablers.
"It is only with the heart that one can see rightly; what is essential is invisible to the eye". The Little Prince, Antoine de Saint-Exupery, pilot and author, lost on mission, July 1944, Med Theatre.
|Powered by Social Strata||Page 1 2 3|