SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    The Trump Presidency : Year III
Page 1 ... 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 ... 348

Closed Topic Closed
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
The Trump Presidency : Year III Login/Join 
Partial dichotomy
posted Hide Post
https://www.realclearpolitics....n_el_paso_texas.html

Full Replay: President Trump Holds 2020 Campaign Rally in El Paso, Texas




SIGforum: For all your needs!
Imagine our influence if every gun owner in America was an NRA member! Click the box>>>
 
Posts: 38642 | Location: SC Lowcountry/Cape Cod | Registered: November 22, 2002Report This Post
Lawyers, Guns
and Money
Picture of chellim1
posted Hide Post
Trump Undecided On Tentative Border Deal With Minimal Wall Funding

President Trump has not yet decided if he'll support a bipartisan congressional border security deal which provides just $1.375 billion for 55 new miles of border fencing in Texas's Rio Grande Valley area - far short of the $5.7 billion Trump has demanded for his signature campaign promise, reports Bloomberg, citing an administration official.

As of Tuesday morning, the White House official said they are waiting to review the full language of the deal.

While the agreement falls short of Trump's requested figure, the new deal also eliminates caps that Democrats sought on how many border crossers could be detained after being apprehended in the US.

In order to avert another partial government shutdown, the new proposal still has to be written into legislation, pass both chambers of Congress, and Trump has to agree to it before Friday night.

On Monday night, around an hour after the compromise was announced, President Trump took to the stage in the border city of El Paso, Texas for a political rally - telling his audience that he had heard a deal was reached but didn't know the details. He did not indicate whether he would sign the legislation, however he touted the need for a border wall.

"Just so you know, we’re building the wall anyway," said Trump. "We’re setting the table, we’re doing whatever we have to do. The wall’s being built."

https://www.zerohedge.com/news...l-minimal-wall-funds



"Some things are apparent. Where government moves in, community retreats, civil society disintegrates and our ability to control our own destiny atrophies. The result is: families under siege; war in the streets; unapologetic expropriation of property; the precipitous decline of the rule of law; the rapid rise of corruption; the loss of civility and the triumph of deceit. The result is a debased, debauched culture which finds moral depravity entertaining and virtue contemptible."
-- Justice Janice Rogers Brown

"The United States government is the largest criminal enterprise on earth."
-rduckwor
 
Posts: 24055 | Location: St. Louis, MO | Registered: April 03, 2009Report This Post
Member
Picture of ersatzknarf
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by sigmonkey:
True! She’s a beauty, ya know.


One in a million... Wink




 
Posts: 4917 | Registered: June 06, 2012Report This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
I so hope Trump shuts down the government if he doesn’t get the $5+ billion for a wall. A bill with anything less shouldn’t make it thru the Senate though anyway.
 
Posts: 3953 | Location: UNK | Registered: October 04, 2009Report This Post
Baroque Bloke
Picture of Pipe Smoker
posted Hide Post
“President Trump's former lawyer, John Dowd, says he doesn't expect the special counsel to release a report on his findings in the Russia probe.

He told ABC News in a podcast that he would be 'shocked' if any of Robert Mueller's conclusions about the president became public.

'I don't think there'll be a report,' he offered. 'I will be shocked if anything regarding the president is made public, other than "We're done." ' 

Dowd characterized the entire probe of alleged collusion as 'a terrible waste of time' for everyone and 'one of the greatest frauds this country's ever seen.' …”

https://mol.im/a/6695653



Serious about crackers
 
Posts: 8931 | Location: San Diego | Registered: July 26, 2014Report This Post
Victim of Life's
Circumstances
Picture of doublesharp
posted Hide Post
This deal is treachery from Mitch McConnell but I expect PDJT to take it. It gives him tremendous ammo for 2020 and he has the balls to use it.

They don't expect him to sign and hope he burns up twitter. My take is that he signs and publicly shames those that structured the budget bill. He has big mo going bigtime and a shutdown will disrupt that. Call it a Win and MAGA!


________________________
God spelled backwards is dog
 
Posts: 4693 | Location: Sunnyside of Louisville | Registered: July 04, 2007Report This Post
quarter MOA visionary
Picture of smschulz
posted Hide Post
I wonder with this weak showing of compromise is just the some of the R's trying to test him on his resolve?
 
Posts: 22894 | Location: Houston, TX | Registered: June 11, 2006Report This Post
Tinker Sailor Soldier Pie
Picture of Balzé Halzé
posted Hide Post
He won't allow the government to shutdown again. President Trump will sign this embarrassment of a spending bill and move towards declaring an Emergency and build the wall with other funds.


~Alan

Acta Non Verba
NRA Life Member (Patron)
God, Family, Guns, Country

Men will fight and die to protect women... because women protect everything else. ~Andrew Klavan

"Once there was only dark. If you ask me, light is winning." ~Rust Cohle
 
Posts: 30401 | Location: Elv. 7,000 feet, Utah | Registered: October 29, 2012Report This Post
Bad dog!
Picture of justjoe
posted Hide Post
Could anything be more clearly a national emergency than thousands of illegals a week pouring over our border and a Congress unwilling to stop them?


______________________________________________________

"You get much farther with a kind word and a gun than with a kind word alone."
 
Posts: 11106 | Location: pennsylvania | Registered: June 05, 2011Report This Post
always with a hat or sunscreen
Picture of bald1
posted Hide Post
I may be missing something but I thought it was revealed that there was a legal path he could take to get funds and build the wall WITHOUT declaring a national emergency. Help: Right? Wrong?



Certifiable member of the gun toting, septuagenarian, bucket list workin', crazed retiree, bald is beautiful club!
USN (RET), COTEP #192
 
Posts: 16183 | Location: Black Hills of South Dakota | Registered: June 20, 2010Report This Post
Objectively Reasonable
Picture of DennisM
posted Hide Post
I doubt DJT ever bought a building for the asking price, understanding the whole concept of negotiation. And I bet he never set an initial asking price for a property expecting that somebody would meet that price as a first offer.

Government budgeting works the same way. Over-ask.

I'm confident that he has a plan.
 
Posts: 2456 | Registered: January 01, 2004Report This Post
Ammoholic
Picture of Skins2881
posted Hide Post
Don't sign it Trump. I don't give two shits if the Federal Government shuts down again. I live in the heart of the government/contractors, my wife works for a company that does nothing but projects for the federal government. Effect on her, or anyone I've talked to was zilch, nada, nothing. A bunch of people got free vacations. The only thing the shutdown resulted in was a bunch of projects getting done, rooms painted, choirs caught up on, and time with family.

Close the whole damn thing down for all I care.

I hate Democrats, but the pussy Republican party is almost as bad. At least the Dems can stand together and fight for what they believe in, even when it's 100% wrong. Grow a fucking spine.



Jesse

Sic Semper Tyrannis
 
Posts: 20810 | Location: Loudoun County, Virginia | Registered: December 27, 2014Report This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
He'll sign it and that's fine IMO. The Dems drew an absurd line in the sand of calling it immoral and saying $0 for it ever. They caved, now it is just about price.

If he has enough $ to build without interruption to the end of the fiscal year (Sep 30th), then the actual amount doesn't matter and there will be a big budget fight then anyway. If it isn't enough for continuous construction, then he has some time to consider other options for more funds or to declare an emergency.




“People have to really suffer before they can risk doing what they love.” –Chuck Palahnuik

Be harder to kill: https://preparefit.ck.page
 
Posts: 5043 | Location: Oregon | Registered: October 02, 2005Report This Post
Member
Picture of olfuzzy
posted Hide Post
I like Ted Cruz's idea, use El Chapo's $14 Billion to make up the difference for the whole wall.


Republican Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas floated the possibility Tuesday of using the seized assets of convicted drug cartel kingpin Joaquin “El Chapo” Guzmán to help build a wall at the southern border.

“America’s justice system prevailed today in convicting Joaquín Guzmán Loera, aka El Chapo, on all 10 counts,” Cruz told his Twitter followers. “U.S. prosecutors are seeking $14 billion in drug profits & other assets from El Chapo which should go towards funding our wall to #SecureTheBorder.”

Cruz’s tweet came moments after Guzmán was convicted of drug-trafficking charges Tuesday morning at a trial in New York. Witnesses detailed assassinations and political payoffs during the nearly three-month long trial. He was found guilty of trafficking over 440,000 pounds of cocaine and will likely have $14 billion in assets seized by U.S. officials.

Cruz reintroduced the Ensuring Lawful Collection of Hidden Assets to Provide Order Act, or EL CHAPO Act, to Congress in January. The bill would designate any money and assets seized from the gangster and allocate them for the construction of a border wall.

President Donald Trump and Republicans have struggled during the past two months to secure funding for a wall as Democrats continue to blanch at such an offer. There are some signs of hope. Congressional negotiators announced a tentative deal Monday night that includes $1.375 billion in funding for a barrier.

“It’s time to pass the El Chapo Act, legislation that Sen. Cruz has introduced, which would use El Chapo’s massive $14 billion fortune subject to criminal asset forfeiture to secure the border and build the wall,” a spokesman in Cruz’s office said in a statement to The Daily Caller News Foundation.

“Stopping narcotics traffickers like El Chapo from crossing the border using El Chapo’s illicitly obtained fortune – and not American taxpayer dollars – would be an act of poetic justice and a common-sense solution to securing the border,” he added.



https://dailycaller.com/2019/0...wall-trump-el-chapo/
 
Posts: 5181 | Location: 20 miles north of hell | Registered: November 07, 2012Report This Post
Muzzle flash
aficionado
Picture of flashguy
posted Hide Post
I'm not actually worried about what President Trump will do about this issue. I am only interested in what he actually does about building the Wall. He has said he will get it built and he's been pretty solid about keeping his promises so far, so I have confidence he'll get it done--one way or another.

We lucked out in 2016 and trashed Hillary. Trump has been mostly good for us as a country and I'm solidly behind him.

flashguy




Texan by choice, not accident of birth
 
Posts: 27902 | Location: Dallas, TX | Registered: May 08, 2006Report This Post
Ammoholic
Picture of Skins2881
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Strambo:
He'll sign it and that's fine IMO. The Dems drew an absurd line in the sand of calling it immoral and saying $0 for it ever. They caved, now it is just about price.

If he has enough $ to build without interruption to the end of the fiscal year (Sep 30th), then the actual amount doesn't matter and there will be a big budget fight then anyway. If it isn't enough for continuous construction, then he has some time to consider other options for more funds or to declare an emergency.


I like your prospective, but I still reserve the right to bitch about not getting the $5.7B which in itself wasn't enough to build it to begin with. I also reserve the right to bitch about the un-unified pussy Republican party. Plus I'd like to see a counteroffer if that's even possible with two days to go.



Jesse

Sic Semper Tyrannis
 
Posts: 20810 | Location: Loudoun County, Virginia | Registered: December 27, 2014Report This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Skins2881:

I like your prospective, but I still reserve the right to bitch about not getting the $5.7B which in itself wasn't enough to build it to begin with. I also reserve the right to bitch about the un-unified pussy Republican party. Plus I'd like to see a counteroffer if that's even possible with two days to go.


Heh, yeah. I feel the same way, so long as nothing gets de-railed over it and we keep making progress.

We are in this mess because Libs have been content for over 100 years to take tiny steps forward whilst conservatives always make the "perfect" the enemy of the "good."

Here is why Trump wins big even if he doesn't counter. The libs said the wall was immoral, now they have compromised their deeply held moral value system...or it was it sham (Of course it was and they are exposed). Either way, the wall is moving forward and they can't really go back to a 100% no-wall position so easy.

Trump just agreed to a lower number...he never compromised his moral values on the issue.




“People have to really suffer before they can risk doing what they love.” –Chuck Palahnuik

Be harder to kill: https://preparefit.ck.page
 
Posts: 5043 | Location: Oregon | Registered: October 02, 2005Report This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
I think Trump will be clever with anything that at least establishes a budget bucket for border wall construction. The man understands development. Surveying, he'll use the corp of engineers; surveys aren't wall, different budget. Land acquisition, use national parks; Land ain't wall. Excavation, army corp of engineers again; holes ain't wall either. Etc., Etc. You get the idea.

Ken
 
Posts: 1049 | Location: Oklahoma | Registered: December 28, 2010Report This Post
Happily Retired
Picture of Bassamatic
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Pipe Smoker:
“President Trump's former lawyer, John Dowd, says he doesn't expect the special counsel to release a report on his findings in the Russia probe.

He told ABC News in a podcast that he would be 'shocked' if any of Robert Mueller's conclusions about the president became public.

'I don't think there'll be a report,' he offered. 'I will be shocked if anything regarding the president is made public, other than "We're done." ' 

Dowd characterized the entire probe of alleged collusion as 'a terrible waste of time' for everyone and 'one of the greatest frauds this country's ever seen.' …”

https://mol.im/a/6695653


As I understand it, regulations require that the Special Counsel report his finding to the Attorney General and only the Attorney General. He then decides what is made public and what is not.



.....never marry a woman who is mean to your waitress.
 
Posts: 5035 | Location: Lake of the Ozarks, MO. | Registered: September 05, 2005Report This Post
wishing we
were congress
posted Hide Post
The Senate voted on Tuesday to break a Democratic filibuster of the nomination of William Barr to be the next US attorney general.

The 55-to-44 vote split on partisan lines with only three Democrats voting to advance Trump's nominee.

Sens. Joe Manchin of West Virginia, Doug Jones of Alabama and Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona joined Republicans to support Barr's nomination.

Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky was the only Republican to vote no.

Nearly all the Democrats running or considering running for president voted against advancing the nomination, though Sen. Cory Booker of New Jersey did not vote.

A final vote is expected later this week.

https://www.cnn.com/2019/02/12...nate-vote/index.html

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

I think Barr will do a good job as AG. Sure hope so.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

from the transcript of John Dowd's interview w ABC:

Early on, we wrote a letter to Mueller, saying, "Look. Comey's the accuser in this phony investigation. We think there are other issues in-- regarding his conduct, as to the origin of this whole business."

Turns out, not only was I right, but Comey admitted there were no facts to investigate the president at all.

There was no collusion. So—I, and then, so-- Bob said he wasn't looking' at it. So I wrote to Rosenstein. He blew me off. That's not leadership. That's not accountability. This is a very serious-- I mean, we were very serious. And we did it in writing. We did it politely. We did it confidentially. And he just blew us off. So I lost all respect for Rob Rosenstein"

xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

So Mueller said he wasn't even looking at Comey's conduct in the origin of the FBI counterintel operation against Russia and the Trump administration.
 
Posts: 19561 | Registered: July 21, 2002Report This Post
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 ... 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 ... 348 

Closed Topic Closed

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    The Trump Presidency : Year III

© SIGforum 2024