|Too clever by half|
I bet she believes Guam will tip over.
Never try to teach a pig to sing. It's a waste of your time, and it annoys the pig.
It is most certainly agenda driven. Does that somehow minimize the fact that the agenda itself is based on a stupid premise or that the person advancing the agenda, by proxy, demonstrates an elevated level of stupidity for advancing said agenda? I think not. Regardless, I predict this proposal will die a swift, well deserved death. Business owners won't stand for it.
So, allowing people to protect or save their lives is racist. Fascinating. Obviously, she is the EOE hire.
NEVER underestimate the capacity for stupidity in elected officials. I can't count the times I had "You gotta be shitting me" moments with elected officials. If you drill down you will find a surprisingly small number of voters in her election, who don't have a clue as to the issues or anything else in the real world.
CMSGT USAF (Retired)
Chief of Police (Retired)
Florida Class K Licensed Instructor
NRA Certified Firearms Instructor/RSO
NRA Certified LE Handgun/Shotgun/Rifle Instructor
SIG and Glock Armorer
So, Soros is involved in electing BLM's District Attys. Why does that old monster want a race war in the US? He won't be alive to profit off it or pull the strings. So why does he want revolution ond insurrection so badly?
What a moron.
Perhaps she is also involved with the Flat Earth Society.
| Get my pies|
outta the oven!
Nothing from Philly surprises me any longer. This is what you get when you elect only Democrats for nearly 70 years now, year in, year out.
-They elected a hard-left Dem Bill DeBlasio wannabe for Mayor.
-They JUST elected a new DA who has promised, PROMISED to side with the criminals and go after cops!
-They put a 1.5 cent tax on just about every soft dink imaginable and are now wondering why sales in the city are crashing and stores are struggling while sales just over the city limits are booming.
She represents both the People and the Folks in her district.
OK, now the inmates really are running the asylum. This bill passed out of committe today and will be put to a full council vote on Thursday, 12/14.
Stay tuned for our next exciting episode.
NRA Benefactor Member
|The success of a solution usually depends upon your point of view|
If this passes and a clerk is killed at a store that used to have security glass, how much will the lawsuit that follows cost the city?
“Banning guns is like banning forks in an attempt to stop making people fat.” - Vince Vaughn
|Proud member of |
the vanning collective
If passed this will be an easy fix for the shop owners.
No access inside the store only walk up and drive up windows where the customer stays outside.
We have one little shop here that works in this fashion.
Life can only be understood backwards; but it must be lived forwards.
I see these questions about governmental policies and statutes all the time, but I don’t recall ever seeing any actual lawsuits. I was under the general impression that such matters were not subject to tort claims, and suits against governments were limited to wrongful acts by employees. Am I wrong? Can I sue my town for the bumps in the road that they don’t fix in a timely manner? How about the police department for not keeping motorized vehicles off the hiking trail that goes by my house? City hall is in a 19th century building with a huge flight of stairs (no elevator) up to the floor where the city clerk is; can I sue them if I have a heart attack (or just get tired) walking up?
Inquiring minds would like to know.
“[T]ry not to shoot any friendlies ….”
|The guy behind the guy|
If they want to crack down on convenience stores selling shots and beers that people are then taking out onto the sidewalk, I completely understand that.
Such a store is a nuisance and eye sore. Such a store would not be welcome in my suburb, so I get that.
How bullet proof glass helps this issue is beyond me though. Crack down on those loitering and urinating in public. Change the liquor laws allowing those stores to sell single drinks.
They are making a new silly law because they aren't using the ones they already have. I will never understand why legislatures do this kind of thing.
I'm confused...wait, maybe I'm not.
|safe & sound|
Because once we figure out that we don't need any new laws then we will also figure out we no longer need those who make them.
|Powered by Social Strata||Page 1 2 3|