SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    Listing agent kills deal by contacting buyer's banker update page 2
Page 1 2 3 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Listing agent kills deal by contacting buyer's banker update page 2 Login/Join 
paradox in a box
Picture of frayedends
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by 46and2:
quote:
Originally posted by southernmaninla:
Well we now have further information. the listing agent not only contacted the bank she emailed old photos of the house before any of the remodel work was done as proof of the condition. We have the emails.

Super shady.


I was about to argue with you. But reading southern’e post again it seems maybe the pictures sent weren’t accurate. That’s weird.




These go to eleven.
 
Posts: 12436 | Location: Westminster, MA | Registered: November 14, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
I've always been Crazy!
kept me from goin Insane!
posted Hide Post
Frayed. To further clarify today the 20 day Fannie Mae hold for a owner/ occupancy expired. I put in an offer and 2 others put in an offer. I know who 1 is. My employee has "dropped" his. The other party is an unknown, my suspicion is the unnamed bid is either the listing agent or a "friend" of hers. With what she has done it makes sense. This afternoon she sent an email stating 4offers, make your best offer by 10am tomorrow. My opinion she is shady as hell. I contacted Fannie and stated what we know THEY strongly urged me to file a formal complaint with them and Kansas real estate commission.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


A 'Veteran' -- whether active duty, discharged, retired, or reserve -- is someone who, at one point in his life, wrote a blank check made payable to 'The United States of America,' for an amount of 'up to, and including his life.' That is honor, and there are way too many people in this country today, who no longer understand that fact.
Author unknown
 
Posts: 2180 | Location: Lyndon,KS | Registered: November 07, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
safe & sound
Picture of a1abdj
posted Hide Post
quote:
This afternoon she sent an email stating 4offers, make your best offer by 10am tomorrow.



Is this a HUD house?

Maybe they've changed things, but the last time I dealt with a HUD house they didn't accept offers, get multiples, and then ask for your highest and best. Perhaps if all of the offers were identical.....

Unlike other people wanting to use the real estate market like E-bay, HUD had a price and the first person to offer it (or the highest acceptable by their formula) was accepted.


________________________



www.zykansafe.com
 
Posts: 15716 | Location: St. Charles, MO, USA | Registered: September 22, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
I've always been Crazy!
kept me from goin Insane!
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by a1abdj:
quote:
This afternoon she sent an email stating 4offers, make your best offer by 10am tomorrow.



Is this a HUD house?

Maybe they've changed things, but the last time I dealt with a HUD house they didn't accept offers, get multiples, and then ask for your highest and best. Perhaps if all of the offers were identical.....

Unlike other people wanting to use the real estate market like E-bay, HUD had a price and the first person to offer it (or the highest acceptable by their formula) was accepted.


It's a Fannie Mae forclosure. I think she is scamming the system. The formal investigation that is sure to come will find out.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


A 'Veteran' -- whether active duty, discharged, retired, or reserve -- is someone who, at one point in his life, wrote a blank check made payable to 'The United States of America,' for an amount of 'up to, and including his life.' That is honor, and there are way too many people in this country today, who no longer understand that fact.
Author unknown
 
Posts: 2180 | Location: Lyndon,KS | Registered: November 07, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
safe & sound
Picture of a1abdj
posted Hide Post
quote:
I think she is scamming the system.



It's entirely possible. HUD's system is set up to favor an owner/occupant over an investor, so it reduces the games to some extent.

When I was heavier into looking I would find bank own properties that were listed an hour or two prior to me calling the agent only to be informed that they were already under contract. Really? An offer was submitted (to a bank none the less), considered, and accepted in the last 90 minutes?

It was the same game. They had a buddy that wanted it. They got the opportunity to know it was available before anybody else, get all of their ducks in a row, and then the agent would list it just to say they had. There was never any intention for anybody else to to have an opportunity.


________________________



www.zykansafe.com
 
Posts: 15716 | Location: St. Charles, MO, USA | Registered: September 22, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Lots of realtors were doing this here in South Florida after the fall when there were lots of foreclosures......they'd take bids for the banks, then send out a memo to submit your highest and best offer, sometimes high offers would simply never make it to the bank......then one of their investor buddies would come in just above everyone else and get the property.
 
Posts: 21335 | Registered: June 12, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
His Royal Hiney
Picture of Rey HRH
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by frayedends:
quote:
Originally posted by Rey HRH:

But shouldn’t the listing agent raise that issue to the seller when accepting the offer instead of bad mouthing the property he was hired to sell?


If you read the entire thread you will find that the offer wasn’t accepted. The listing agent was simply verifying the financing because the offer was with an unconventional loan. It’s simple due diligence when advising the seller on whether it’s a good offer or not.


That doesn’t take away from my point that the listing agent shouldn’t be bad mouthing a property he was hired to sell. If it’s a bad financing deal on 3% down, it would still be a bad financing deal at 20% down based on the house. The bank’s concern is the value of the collateral but, mainly, the ability of the buyer to repay. They even have 0% down available for vets.

And if it’s a bad financial deal at the full asking price, something really is shady. As I understand it, realtors want fast sells at high prices. But between the two, they’ll take fast transactions anytime as it frees up their time to sell another house and it beats the commission difference of waiting for a higher price.



"It did not really matter what we expected from life, but rather what life expected from us. We needed to stop asking about the meaning of life, and instead to think of ourselves as those who were being questioned by life – daily and hourly. Our answer must consist not in talk and meditation, but in right action and in right conduct. Life ultimately means taking the responsibility to find the right answer to its problems and to fulfill the tasks which it constantly sets for each individual." Viktor Frankl, Man's Search for Meaning, 1946.
 
Posts: 19659 | Location: The Free State of Arizona - Ditat Deus | Registered: March 24, 2011Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Oh stewardess,
I speak jive.
Picture of 46and2
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by frayedends:
quote:
Originally posted by 46and2:
quote:
Originally posted by southernmaninla:
Well we now have further information. the listing agent not only contacted the bank she emailed old photos of the house before any of the remodel work was done as proof of the condition. We have the emails.

Super shady.


I was about to argue with you. But reading southern’e post again it seems maybe the pictures sent weren’t accurate. That’s weird.

Yeah, my opinion is based solely upon the supposed monkey business with the photos.
 
Posts: 25613 | Registered: March 12, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Doing my best to shape
America's youth
Picture of MooneyP226
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by southernmaninla:


It's not over yet. Just seems really fishy. I'm throwing my hat in the ring Thursday. I'll owner finance it to my employee.


Sir, you're a rare breed in this world. Kudos.




Clarior Hinc Honos

BSA Dad, Cheer Dad
 
Posts: 1624 | Location: on the 42nd parallel  | Registered: November 19, 2013Reply With QuoteReport This Post
paradox in a box
Picture of frayedends
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Rey HRH:
quote:
Originally posted by frayedends:
quote:
Originally posted by Rey HRH:

But shouldn’t the listing agent raise that issue to the seller when accepting the offer instead of bad mouthing the property he was hired to sell?


If you read the entire thread you will find that the offer wasn’t accepted. The listing agent was simply verifying the financing because the offer was with an unconventional loan. It’s simple due diligence when advising the seller on whether it’s a good offer or not.


That doesn’t take away from my point that the listing agent shouldn’t be bad mouthing a property he was hired to sell. If it’s a bad financing deal on 3% down, it would still be a baddie financing deal at 20% down based on the house. The bank’s concern is the value of the collateral but, mainly, the ability of the buyer to repay. They even have 0% down available for vets.

And if it’s a bad financial deal at the full asking price, something really is shady. As I understand it, realtors want fast sells at high prices. But between the two, they’ll take fast transactions anytime as it frees up their time to sell another house and it beats the commission difference of waiting for a higher price.


My point, if we ignore the photo monkey business, is that the realtor may have good reason to think financing will fall through if the property has certain issues. So informing the bank up front saves headaches in the end. Nothing wrong with doing that. Obviously there may be more going on here if the realtor sent the bank inaccurate photos.




These go to eleven.
 
Posts: 12436 | Location: Westminster, MA | Registered: November 14, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Just because you can,
doesn't mean you should
posted Hide Post
Could be the realtor is just lazy too. I always start with the simple explanation.
Her commission is going to be a few hundred dollars after splitting it and various fees. Then there's the hassle dealing with financing such a low amount, especially if it's through one of the government agencies.


___________________________
Avoid buying ChiCom/CCP products whenever possible.
 
Posts: 9506 | Location: NE GA | Registered: August 22, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
paradox in a box
Picture of frayedends
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by 220-9er:
Could be the realtor is just lazy too. I always start with the simple explanation.
Her commission is going to be a few hundred dollars after splitting it and various fees. Then there's the hassle dealing with financing such a low amount, especially if it's through one of the government agencies.


If they were lazy then wouldn't they just take the first offer and get it over with?




These go to eleven.
 
Posts: 12436 | Location: Westminster, MA | Registered: November 14, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
safe & sound
Picture of a1abdj
posted Hide Post
quote:
Could be the realtor is just lazy too. I always start with the simple explanation.
Her commission is going to be a few hundred dollars after splitting it and various fees.



Exactly. But if her buddy comes in and buys it maybe she'll partner up with him. Or get her commission here and again when her buddy fixes it up and sells it.

It's not about loosing any commission. It's about loosing additional opportunity.


________________________



www.zykansafe.com
 
Posts: 15716 | Location: St. Charles, MO, USA | Registered: September 22, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
His Royal Hiney
Picture of Rey HRH
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by frayedends:
quote:
Originally posted by Rey HRH:

That doesn’t take away from my point that the listing agent shouldn’t be bad mouthing a property he was hired to sell. If it’s a bad financing deal on 3% down, it would still be a baddie financing deal at 20% down based on the house. The bank’s concern is the value of the collateral but, mainly, the ability of the buyer to repay. They even have 0% down available for vets.

And if it’s a bad financial deal at the full asking price, something really is shady. As I understand it, realtors want fast sells at high prices. But between the two, they’ll take fast transactions anytime as it frees up their time to sell another house and it beats the commission difference of waiting for a higher price.


My point, if we ignore the photo monkey business, is that the realtor may have good reason to think financing will fall through if the property has certain issues. So informing the bank up front saves headaches in the end. Nothing wrong with doing that. Obviously there may be more going on here if the realtor sent the bank inaccurate photos.


I'm trying to understand the situation, not argue with you, just to be clear.

The realtor was hired to list and sell the property. That's his responsibility, duty, etc. per the contract he has with the property owner, right? Successful performance of his duties is to facilitate a purchase transaction all the way through. He doesn't get paid his commission until escrow closes on the property and the title change hands.

If the property has certain issues that will be a hindrance for financing, why doesn't he get that resolved with the property owner? If he gets whatever issues there are resolved, then that would enable financing to go through. Bad mouthing the property to discourage financing doesn't resolve the issue.

He supposedly has nothing to gain by not facilitating the sale of the property to go through. The sooner he can facilitate the sale, the sooner he gets his commission and the sooner the current owner is satisfied.

Since he stopped the financing by bad mouthing the property which doesn't solve whatever issues there may be, then what does he have to gain? Even setting aside the bad pictures, just the fact that he bad mouthed the property he was hired to facilitate the sales thereof, says he has a hidden agenda.

Put yourself in the property owner's shoes. If you found out that the listing agent you hired to sell your property was bad mouthing your property, would you think that it makes your property more sellable or less sellable? Would you think the final sales price would be less than, more than, or the same as your current asking price? And how would you feel about the listing agent?



"It did not really matter what we expected from life, but rather what life expected from us. We needed to stop asking about the meaning of life, and instead to think of ourselves as those who were being questioned by life – daily and hourly. Our answer must consist not in talk and meditation, but in right action and in right conduct. Life ultimately means taking the responsibility to find the right answer to its problems and to fulfill the tasks which it constantly sets for each individual." Viktor Frankl, Man's Search for Meaning, 1946.
 
Posts: 19659 | Location: The Free State of Arizona - Ditat Deus | Registered: March 24, 2011Reply With QuoteReport This Post
paradox in a box
Picture of frayedends
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Rey HRH:
quote:
Originally posted by frayedends:
quote:
Originally posted by Rey HRH:

That doesn’t take away from my point that the listing agent shouldn’t be bad mouthing a property he was hired to sell. If it’s a bad financing deal on 3% down, it would still be a baddie financing deal at 20% down based on the house. The bank’s concern is the value of the collateral but, mainly, the ability of the buyer to repay. They even have 0% down available for vets.

And if it’s a bad financial deal at the full asking price, something really is shady. As I understand it, realtors want fast sells at high prices. But between the two, they’ll take fast transactions anytime as it frees up their time to sell another house and it beats the commission difference of waiting for a higher price.


My point, if we ignore the photo monkey business, is that the realtor may have good reason to think financing will fall through if the property has certain issues. So informing the bank up front saves headaches in the end. Nothing wrong with doing that. Obviously there may be more going on here if the realtor sent the bank inaccurate photos.


I'm trying to understand the situation, not argue with you, just to be clear.

The realtor was hired to list and sell the property. That's his responsibility, duty, etc. per the contract he has with the property owner, right? Successful performance of his duties is to facilitate a purchase transaction all the way through. He doesn't get paid his commission until escrow closes on the property and the title change hands.

If the property has certain issues that will be a hindrance for financing, why doesn't he get that resolved with the property owner? If he gets whatever issues there are resolved, then that would enable financing to go through. Bad mouthing the property to discourage financing doesn't resolve the issue.

He supposedly has nothing to gain by not facilitating the sale of the property to go through. The sooner he can facilitate the sale, the sooner he gets his commission and the sooner the current owner is satisfied.

Since he stopped the financing by bad mouthing the property which doesn't solve whatever issues there may be, then what does he have to gain? Even setting aside the bad pictures, just the fact that he bad mouthed the property he was hired to facilitate the sales thereof, says he has a hidden agenda.

Put yourself in the property owner's shoes. If you found out that the listing agent you hired to sell your property was bad mouthing your property, would you think that it makes your property more sellable or less sellable? Would you think the final sales price would be less than, more than, or the same as your current asking price? And how would you feel about the listing agent?


No worries, I'm not trying to argue either. Just trying to understand this situation as well. One thing I think you may be missing is that it is a bank owned property. The bank isn't going to do any work on it. They basically tell the agent to sell the house as is. I'm familiar with this type of transaction as my girlfriend actually has one of these types of properties up right now. It has lost financing 3 times because the buyers claimed to have certain financing and then tried to use a conventional mortgage. Very often bank owned properties in bad condition require cash only sales.

Again the difference here seems to be some weird business regarding pictures and the fact it's one of the owner occupied preferred properties.




These go to eleven.
 
Posts: 12436 | Location: Westminster, MA | Registered: November 14, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Just because you can,
doesn't mean you should
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by frayedends:
quote:
Originally posted by 220-9er:
Could be the realtor is just lazy too. I always start with the simple explanation.
Her commission is going to be a few hundred dollars after splitting it and various fees. Then there's the hassle dealing with financing such a low amount, especially if it's through one of the government agencies.


If they were lazy then wouldn't they just take the first offer and get it over with?


A cash offer with no contingencies, yes, that would be preferred by the agent. An offer with 3% down on a $30,000 house and all the crap that goes with one of these government backed loans, no.

I'm not excusing what may have been done, just explaining the reason.

Where I live it is common that a particular realtor will handle most or all of the listings of these foreclosure properties. They take them because of the volume and there are more expensive ones with a larger commission and not HUD or other loans. They don't require much marketing. The small ones are just a pain to deal with.


___________________________
Avoid buying ChiCom/CCP products whenever possible.
 
Posts: 9506 | Location: NE GA | Registered: August 22, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Bolt Thrower
Picture of Voshterkoff
posted Hide Post
Every single bank/gov listed home around me had something that disqualified it from a conventional mortgage. I wouldn't blame a broker for not wanting to deal with financing on a house that cheap. It's really a shame as many homes could easily be fixed up and be perfect for owner occupiers, but up here a cheap house is high $300k. Not many first time buyers have that cash laying around.
 
Posts: 9961 | Location: Woodinville, WA | Registered: March 30, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
paradox in a box
Picture of frayedends
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by 220-9er:
quote:
Originally posted by frayedends:
quote:
Originally posted by 220-9er:
Could be the realtor is just lazy too. I always start with the simple explanation.
Her commission is going to be a few hundred dollars after splitting it and various fees. Then there's the hassle dealing with financing such a low amount, especially if it's through one of the government agencies.


If they were lazy then wouldn't they just take the first offer and get it over with?


A cash offer with no contingencies, yes, that would be preferred by the agent. An offer with 3% down on a $30,000 house and all the crap that goes with one of these government backed loans, no.

I'm not excusing what may have been done, just explaining the reason.

Where I live it is common that a particular realtor will handle most or all of the listings of these foreclosure properties. They take them because of the volume and there are more expensive ones with a larger commission and not HUD or other loans. They don't require much marketing. The small ones are just a pain to deal with.


Okay, I see your point. I think we are pretty much on the same page.




These go to eleven.
 
Posts: 12436 | Location: Westminster, MA | Registered: November 14, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2 3  
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    Listing agent kills deal by contacting buyer's banker update page 2

© SIGforum 2024