They have a pill for that. It will be covered by universal health care. Maybe they can feed it to the cows.
You can only go so far in any one direction before you eventually drive off a cliff
|Waiting for Hachiko|
Blaming dogs? More likely cats.
Damn, us Old Farts are screwed.
"We got what it takes to take what you got." - Internal Revenue Service.
|Master of one hand |
AOC better ban oatmeal. If I eat oatmeal. I can fire a furnace.
NRA Benefactor CMP Pistol Distinguished
You can only go so far in any one direction before you eventually drive off a cliff
Good gracious. Some of this shit is out of this world.....
___________________________________Sigforum - port in the fake news storm.____________Be kind to the Homeless. A lot of us are one bad decision away from there.
|The Unmanned Writer|
Ever hear about the goobermint's new food staple - Soylant Green?
Sentiment without action is the ruin of the soul.
Help, I'm having premonitions of future flashbacks.
Only in an insane world are the sane considered insane.
Some people listen to the noise of the world,
And some people listen to the quiet.
"All Californians, like all citizens of the United States, have a fundamental Constitutional right to keep and bear common and dangerous arms. The nation’s Founders used arms for self-protection, for the common defense, for hunting food, and as a check against tyranny." Judge Benitez - March 2019
Participating in a gun buy back program because you think criminals have too many guns is like having yourself castrated because you think your neighbor has too many kids
"I'm only myself when I have a guitar in my hands." - George Harrison
I may be a bad person, but at least I use my turn signal.
In high winds and no life jackets?
| Get my pies|
outta the oven!
Well, here you go.
AOC's idiotic plan gets dissected and rightfully mocked and laughed at: no more air travel! No more farting cows! Paying people who aren't willing to work! and but now it's all a hoax perpetuated and pushed by Republicans.
You can't make this stuff up!
The mysterious case of AOC’s scrubbed 'Green New Deal' details
She will be the Fredo Corleone of the Democrats, and will disappear when she no longer serves their agenda. A useful idiot to present their ideas, and take flack then those ideas don’t go over to well.
"Hold my beer.....Watch this".
Godfather II. Fredo's demise.
NRA Life Member - "Fear God and Dreadnaught"
I wonder if she'll still, like, run for president next year or whatever...
"A good plan violently executed now is better than a perfect plan executed next week." George S. Patton
|It's not you,|
Lol, like it never even happened. Crazy shit.
Be unpredictable at times. Only boring, dull-witted people never stray from the path. - Para
|Edge seeking |
Her birthdate is October 13, 1989, she'll be 35 just before the 2024 election.
It was "erroneous information."
Ocasio-Cortez retracts erroneous information about ‘Green New Deal’ backed by 2020 Democratic candidates
By Jeff Stein and
David Weigel February 11 at 12:32 PM
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) is pushing for a debate on the substance of her “Green New Deal” resolution after her staff distributed an erroneous fact sheet regarding the proposal, leading to confusion over a plan supported by many of the Democratic Party’s leading candidates for president.
Ocasio-Cortez’s staff posted online and sent to reporters a list of “frequently asked questions” about the Green New Deal. Those pages included language and policies not included in the resolution itself such as providing economics security to those “unwilling to work” and ruling out nuclear power as part of the solution to the climate crisis.
More than 70 House Democrats and 12 Senate Democrats have backed Ocasio-Cortez in unveiling the Green New Deal resolution calling for a massive jobs program to stave off climate change, aiming for an enormous investment in “clean, renewable, and zero-emission energy sources” over the next 10 years.
Declared presidential candidates Sens. Kamala D. Harris (D-Calif.), Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Cory Booker (D-N.J.) and Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) have pledged their support for the resolution text of the Green New Deal, as has expected candidate Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.). None of the lawmakers or candidates signed off on the FAQ, which was prepared by Ocasio-Cortez’s staff to explain the separate Green New Deal resolution but was accidentally released prematurely with unfinished language.
“An early draft of a FAQ that was clearly unfinished and that doesn’t represent the GND resolution got published to the website by mistake,” Saikat Chakrabarti, Ocasio-Cortez’s chief of staff, wrote on Twitter on Saturday, two days after the document’s release. “Mistakes happen when doing time launches like this coordinating multiple groups and collaborators.”
The confusion over the document complicated the rollout of the Green New Deal plan, as more than a dozen media outlets, particularly in the conservative media, reported on policies in the FAQ page that the co-signers of the resolution have not agreed to support. One House Democrat, speaking on the condition of anonymity to speak about internal discussions, said he and other liberal members have privately vented frustration over the publication of the FAQ page.
CNBC reported that the Green New Deal would offer “economic security” for those “unwilling to work” in its headline, while columnists at Bloomberg and The Washington Post have criticized the plan based on policies outlined in the FAQ sheet.
Climate activists have tried rallying Democrats to the concept of a Green New Deal to decarbonize the U.S. economy while also broadly expanding the government’s role in improving the economy and bolstering the social safety net. The plan calls for a 10-year “national mobilization” requiring new electrical and power grids, retrofitting “all existing buildings” in the United States and high-speed rail and public transit.
The Green New Deal resolution calls for the federal government to achieve net-zero greenhouse gas emissions with a “fair and just transition” for all communities and workers, including by creating millions of high-wage jobs, health care and housing for all, a sustainable environment, and enormous infrastructure investments.
The FAQ sheet went further than the resolution in some places, making choices that the resolution avoids. The FAQ sheet, for instance, says that the Green New Deal would “not include creating new nuclear plants,” while the resolution does not address that question.
At a news conference unveiling the plan, Sen. Edward J. Markey (D-Mass.), the resolution’s Senate co-sponsors, told E&E News: “The resolution is silent on any individual technology which can move us toward a solution of this problem . . . that is not part of the resolution.”
The FAQ page also stated that the United States should guarantee “economic security for all who are unable or unwilling to work.” The official resolution calls on economic security for all Americans.
In the fall, the top scientific body studying climate change found the world had to take “unprecedented” steps to reduce carbon levels, with the globe on pace to warm by 1.5 degrees Celsius (2.7 degrees Fahrenheit) over preindustrial levels. Scientists called the report a “deafening, piercing smoke alarm going off in the kitchen.”
Stronger natural disasters, including wildfires, have devastated western U.S. communities, while hurricanes have leveled Atlantic Coast cities and the U.S. territory of Puerto Rico. Internationally, the melting of Himalayan glaciers due to climate changes threatens hundreds of millions of people in Asia, as coral reefs that support some of the most productive U.S. fisheries are at risk of being destroyed.
The Trump administration has not proposed a comprehensive agenda for addressing climate change. It has dismantled some initiatives supported by the past administration to check the growth of greenhouse gases, and President Trump has repeatedly questioned the scientific consensus that global warming is occurring, driven by human activity and poses a threat to human health and well-being.
Trump tweeted criticism of the Green New Deal over the weekend, while also erroneously suggesting snow in February in Minnesota during the presidential candidacy announcement of Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) diminished the case for combating climate change.
On Twitter, Ocasio-Cortez said that people should stop paying attention to the FAQ document, which was later taken down from the congresswoman’s website. “Point is, the real one is our submitted resolution,” Ocasio-Cortez tweeted, with a link to the resolution itself. She added: “When I talk about the GND, this is what I’m referring to — nothing else.”
All but one Democratic senator running for president endorsed the Green New Deal resolution, though none had seen the FAQ that circulated on launch day. A few were asked about the FAQ this weekend.
After one stop in Iowa, asked what he might say to a farmer who was seeing reports that the resolution would stop him from raising cows or using gasoline, Booker said that the “narrative” was not something he’d get tangled up in.
"I’ve endorsed the framework and the resolution, but I don’t endorse doing things that are going to hurt the independent family farmer,” Booker said. “If anything, I want to let people know that we can have a green future that no way is contrary to a strong economy, but actually creates a stronger economy.”
The confusion was compounded by Robert Hockett, a Cornell professor who acted as an outside adviser to Ocasio-Cortez on the Green New Deal. Hockett told Fox News’s Tucker Carlson that the document calling for help to those unwilling to work had been “doctored” and produced by someone other than Ocasio-Cortez.
That was not true, as Hockett thought Carlson was referring to a parody of the Green New Deal circulated by right-wing activists on Twitter.
Republicans have begun to conflate support for the Green New Deal — either the resolution, or the concept — as support for the most extreme elements on the FAQ. In a news blast attacking Klobuchar, the RNC said that “Midwest dairy farmers won’t love the ‘war on cows’ in the Green New Deal, a plan she endorsed.”
Chakrabarti, the congresswoman’s chief of staff, wrote on Twitter about the “unwilling to work” provision in the FAQ: “We were essentially thinking about pensions and retirement security. E.g. economic security for a coal miner who has given 40 years of their life to building the energy infra of this country, but who may be not be willing to switch this late in his career.”
In an interview, Chakrabarti also stressed that the key was to focus on the larger plan to prevent climate change that poses an existential threat to millions of people around the world.
“The major thing here is we have now over 70 House Democrats and every major presidential candidate now on board calling for a gigantic transformation of our economy,” Chakrabarti said in an interview. “People are trying to take the focus away from the big picture to these little typos.”
"Yeah, yeah, I'm all for AOC's new Green Deal. Uhhh, that's in it? No, I wouldn't support that." Ah, college students. If they weren't so moronic, they'd have little to nothing to offer.
Guns are awesome because they shoot solid lead freedom. Every man should have several guns. And several dogs, because a man with a cat is a woman. Kurt Schlichter
Send her there without any toilet paper.
|Powered by Social Strata||Page 1 ... 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 ... 91|