SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    SCOTUS declines another 2nd Amendment Case
Page 1 2 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
SCOTUS declines another 2nd Amendment Case Login/Join 
Now in Florida
Picture of ChicagoSigMan
posted
Link

The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday declined to take up a case challenging a California law requiring a 10-day waiting period for gun purchases.

The decision lets stand a ruling by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upholding the waiting period, after gun rights groups argued that it shouldn’t apply to people who already own a firearm or who have a concealed carry license.

In a 14-page dissent, Justice Clarence Thomas said the high court’s “continued inaction” in the area of gun rights indicates that it does not put the Second Amendment on equal footing with other amendments in the bill of rights.

“If a lower court treated another right so cavalierly, I have little doubt that this Court would intervene,” Justice Thomas wrote. “But as evidenced by our continued inaction in this area, the Second Amendment is a disfavored right in this Court.”

In 2016, a three-judge 9th Circuit panel had overturned a 2014 ruling by U.S. District Judge Anthony Ishii that found blanket application of the waiting period unconstitutional.

After major rulings in 2008 and 2010 affirmed the constitutional right for people to keep guns in their home for self-defense, the Supreme Court has shown little appetite in recent years to wade into the issue again.

Since 2010, it has repeatedly declined to take up challenges to other gun laws, such as bans on semi-automatic, military-style firearms and restrictions on concealed carry.
 
Posts: 6063 | Location: FL | Registered: March 09, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Political Cynic
Picture of nhtagmember
posted Hide Post
sad news



[B] Against ALL enemies, foreign and DOMESTIC


 
Posts: 53165 | Location: Tucson Arizona | Registered: January 16, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Tinker Sailor Soldier Pie
Picture of Balzé Halzé
posted Hide Post
Very disappointing.

Though I admit that I also wouldn't mind getting at least one more Trump appointee on the court for the next 2nd amendment case that is heard.


~Alan

Acta Non Verba
NRA Life Member (Patron)
God, Family, Guns, Country

Men will fight and die to protect women... because women protect everything else. ~Andrew Klavan

"Once there was only dark. If you ask me, light is winning." ~Rust Cohle
 
Posts: 30401 | Location: Elv. 7,000 feet, Utah | Registered: October 29, 2012Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of lkdr1989
posted Hide Post
It's not necessarily a bad thing...I think Kennedy is the unknown -- we need to replace him with a reliable constitutionalist; the leftists already have a reliable 4 justices that they can count on.




...let him who has no sword sell his robe and buy one. Luke 22:35-36 NAV

"Behold, I send you out as sheep in the midst of wolves; so be shrewd as serpents and innocent as doves." Matthew 10:16 NASV
 
Posts: 4335 | Location: Valley, Oregon | Registered: June 03, 2010Reply With QuoteReport This Post
The Velvet Voicebox
posted Hide Post
Justice Thomas dissents from Supreme Court decision not to review California gun law

https://bangordailynews.com/20...-california-gun-law/

Latest News | Poll Questions | Tourney Time 2018 | Richard Gates | Winter Olympics Sharing

Politics
Justice Thomas dissents from Supreme Court decision not to review California gun law
Pablo Martinez Monsivais | AP | BDN
Supreme Court Associate Justice Clarence Thomas sits as he is introduced during an event at the Library of Congress, Thursday, Feb. 15, 2018, in Washington.
By Robert Barnes, The Washington Post • February 20, 2018 11:48 am

The Supreme Court on Tuesday turned down a request from gun rights activists to examine California’s 10-day waiting period for firearm sales, prompting Justice Clarence Thomas to say his colleagues are turning the Second Amendment into a “disfavored right.”

Thomas was alone among the justices to note his dissent from the court’s refusal to review a ruling from the U.S. Court of Appeals upholding California’s law, which is similar to one in the District of Columbia and eight other states.

Thomas said the 9th Circuit’s ruling was “symptomatic of the lower courts’ general failure to afford the Second Amendment the respect due” a constitutional right.

“If a lower court treated another right so cavalierly, I have little doubt that this court would intervene,” Thomas wrote. “But as evidenced by our continued inaction in this area, the Second Amendment is a disfavored right in this court.”

Thomas’s 14-page dissent comes as gun control has again dominated the national conversation following the mass shooting at a Florida high school, in which 17 people were killed.

With limited exceptions, California requires a 10-day waiting period for the purchase of any firearm. The state says it needs the time to complete background checks and for a “cooling off period” for those who might be buying a gun to hurt themselves or others.

It was challenged by two men who already are in California’s database as gun owners and who have valid concealed-carry licenses.

Thomas criticized the appeals court for relying on a “common sense understanding” that cooling-off periods deter violence and self-harm. That is not the kind of rigorous examination required of laws restricting an enumerated constitutional right, Thomas wrote.

“If this case involved one of the court’s more favored rights, I sincerely doubt we would have denied” review, Thomas added. “I suspect that four members of this court would review a 10-day waiting period for abortions, notwithstanding a state’s purported interest in creating a ‘cooling off’ period.”



"All great things are simple, and many can be expressed in single words: freedom, justice, honor, duty, mercy, hope."

--Sir Winston Churchill

"The world is filled with violence. Because criminals carry guns, we decent law-abiding citizens should also have guns. Otherwise they will win and the decent people will lose."

--James Earl Jones



 
Posts: 7655 | Location: KCMO | Registered: August 31, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Green Mountain Boy
Picture of Jus228
posted Hide Post
I'm sick and tired of the court being politicized it flat out pisses me off. So so broken.... Frown


!~God Bless the U.S. Military~!

If the world didn't suck, we'd all fall off

Light travels faster than sound, this is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak
 
Posts: 5563 | Location: Vermont | Registered: March 02, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Tinker Sailor Soldier Pie
Picture of Balzé Halzé
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Cliff:

“If this case involved one of the court’s more favored rights, I sincerely doubt we would have denied” review, Thomas added. “I suspect that four members of this court would review a 10-day waiting period for abortions, notwithstanding a state’s purported interest in creating a ‘cooling off’ period.”


I do love my man Clarence.


~Alan

Acta Non Verba
NRA Life Member (Patron)
God, Family, Guns, Country

Men will fight and die to protect women... because women protect everything else. ~Andrew Klavan

"Once there was only dark. If you ask me, light is winning." ~Rust Cohle
 
Posts: 30401 | Location: Elv. 7,000 feet, Utah | Registered: October 29, 2012Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Little ray
of sunshine
Picture of jhe888
posted Hide Post
I'd like them to take a case over whether a particular firearm type regulation is allowable than a waiting period case, if they will strike it down. I would love to see them kill an "assault" weapon ban, for example.

Then do a waiting period, or a no-more-than-ten-guns-a-month rule.

Trying to grok what the Supremes are doing in not taking cases is hard to do, though. Different justices may have different motives. Some may be looking for just the certain case. Others may not want to give the others a chance to win. It can be hard to tell.

And, yes, Clarence Thomas is the man.




The fish is mute, expressionless. The fish doesn't think because the fish knows everything.
 
Posts: 53121 | Location: Texas | Registered: February 10, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
A Grateful American
Picture of sigmonkey
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by jhe888:...

And, yes, Clarence Thomas is the man.


And why the left tried to bury him under a Hill.




"the meaning of life, is to give life meaning" Ani Yehudi אני יהודי Le'olam lo shuv לעולם לא שוב!
 
Posts: 43867 | Location: ...... I am thrice divorced, and I live in a van DOWN BY THE RIVER!!! (in Arkansas) | Registered: December 20, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
I believe in the
principle of
Due Process
Picture of JALLEN
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by sigmonkey:
quote:
Originally posted by jhe888:...

And, yes, Clarence Thomas is the man.


And why the left tried to bury him under a Hill.


And still are. There is an article in New York magazine resurrecting the Hill issues and adding claims of recent abuse.

Link

These abuse claims need to be reeled in somehow. Anybody can claim anything, and apparently, if you told your girlfriend about it at the time 35 years ago, or since, that verifies it.




Luckily, I have enough willpower to control the driving ambition that rages within me.

When you had the votes, we did things your way. Now, we have the votes and you will be doing things our way. This lesson in political reality from Lyndon B. Johnson

"Some things are apparent. Where government moves in, community retreats, civil society disintegrates and our ability to control our own destiny atrophies. The result is: families under siege; war in the streets; unapologetic expropriation of property; the precipitous decline of the rule of law; the rapid rise of corruption; the loss of civility and the triumph of deceit. The result is a debased, debauched culture which finds moral depravity entertaining and virtue contemptible." - Justice Janice Rogers Brown
 
Posts: 48369 | Location: Texas hill country | Registered: July 04, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Now in Florida
Picture of ChicagoSigMan
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by JALLEN:
Anybody can claim anything, and apparently, if you can get your girlfriend to say you told her you told your girlfriend about it at the time 35 years ago, or since, that verifies it.


fixed it
 
Posts: 6063 | Location: FL | Registered: March 09, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
I believe in the
principle of
Due Process
Picture of JALLEN
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by ChicagoSigMan:
quote:
Originally posted by JALLEN:
Anybody can claim anything, and apparently, if you can get your girlfriend to say you told her you told your girlfriend about it at the time 35 years ago, or since, that verifies it.


fixed it


How so? It is the same thing from a different view.




Luckily, I have enough willpower to control the driving ambition that rages within me.

When you had the votes, we did things your way. Now, we have the votes and you will be doing things our way. This lesson in political reality from Lyndon B. Johnson

"Some things are apparent. Where government moves in, community retreats, civil society disintegrates and our ability to control our own destiny atrophies. The result is: families under siege; war in the streets; unapologetic expropriation of property; the precipitous decline of the rule of law; the rapid rise of corruption; the loss of civility and the triumph of deceit. The result is a debased, debauched culture which finds moral depravity entertaining and virtue contemptible." - Justice Janice Rogers Brown
 
Posts: 48369 | Location: Texas hill country | Registered: July 04, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
I often think about when RB Ginsburg retires or dies. She cannot hold out forever. When Trump appoints her replacement, I suspect that the Supreme Court will start hearing the California 2A cases.


-c1steve
 
Posts: 4052 | Location: West coast | Registered: March 31, 2012Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Too clever by half
Picture of jigray3
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by lkdr1989:
It's not necessarily a bad thing...I think Kennedy is the unknown -- we need to replace him with a reliable constitutionalist; the leftists already have a reliable 4 justices that they can count on.


The progressive justices vote as a block more than 90% of the time, the conservatives, just 65%.




"We have a system that increasingly taxes work, and increasingly subsidizes non-work" - Milton Friedman
 
Posts: 10353 | Location: Richmond, VA | Registered: December 11, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Muzzle flash
aficionado
Picture of flashguy
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by jigray3:
quote:
Originally posted by lkdr1989:
It's not necessarily a bad thing...I think Kennedy is the unknown -- we need to replace him with a reliable constitutionalist; the leftists already have a reliable 4 justices that they can count on.


The progressive justices vote as a block more than 90% of the time, the conservatives, just 65%.
That's because the Conservatives actually think about things and the Progressives just don't.

flashguy




Texan by choice, not accident of birth
 
Posts: 27902 | Location: Dallas, TX | Registered: May 08, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Armed and Gregarious
Picture of DMF
posted Hide Post
Those wanting another "conservative" Justice had better hope the mid-term elections don't result in a big change in the Senate.


___________________________________________
"He was never hindered by any dogma, except the Constitution." - Ty Ross speaking of his grandfather General Barry Goldwater

"War is the remedy that our enemies have chosen, and I say let us give them all they want." - William Tecumseh Sherman
 
Posts: 12591 | Location: Nomad | Registered: January 10, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of bigdeal
posted Hide Post
Sure seems Justice Thomas has opted to take over where Justice Scalia left off. Dang thankful for his efforts. Let's hope Justice Gorsach gets into this game before too long.


-----------------------------
Guns are awesome because they shoot solid lead freedom. Every man should have several guns. And several dogs, because a man with a cat is a woman. Kurt Schlichter
 
Posts: 33845 | Location: Orlando, FL | Registered: April 30, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Californi's 10 day waiting period to pick up your just bought legal gun didn't go over too well during the LA riots. Lot's of pissed off people who wanted self protection....NOW!

Unfortunately, nothing was done to fix the problem.


*********
"Some people are alive today because it's against the law to kill them".
 
Posts: 8228 | Location: Arizona | Registered: August 17, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Oriental Redneck
Picture of 12131
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by DMF:
Those wanting another "conservative" Justice had better hope the mid-term elections don't result in a big change in the Senate.

Kennedy needs to retire, now.


Q






 
Posts: 26352 | Location: TEXAS | Registered: September 04, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by sigmonkey:
quote:
Originally posted by jhe888:...

And, yes, Clarence Thomas is the man.


And why the left tried to bury him under a Hill.


Anita Hill Smile
 
Posts: 952 | Location: Mason, Ohio | Registered: September 16, 2015Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2  
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    SCOTUS declines another 2nd Amendment Case

© SIGforum 2024