quote:

Originally posted by Longbow_06:

quote:

Originally posted by chellim1:

quote:

Originally posted by Skins2881:
No I don't think he's arguing that it was a joke and the defendant didn't think it would be seriously taken. He's actually saying that's it's ok to solicit murder as long as no one takes you up on the offer.

That's what I attempted to draw out of him back a few pages (p.13) ... but he didn't respond.

He thinks he's defending the Bill of Rights, but he doesn't seem to understand that one man's rights end where they infringe on another man's rights.

Your Liberty To Swing Your Fist Ends Just Where My Nose Begins

https://quoteinvestigator.com/...5/liberty-fist-nose/

No lol... Your Rights ended where the Government said so.
10 round magazine limits in some States are proof of this.
And if You don’t see that, then you deserve a limitation.

quote:

Originally posted by Longbow_06:

quote:

Originally posted by 6guns:
Wonder how he made it this long as a member here?

Who said it’s him posting.
Now who’s account should I fuck with next?
You fucking morons.

quote:

Originally posted by Longbow_06:
Who said it’s him posting.
Now who’s account should I fuck with next?
You fucking morons.

quote:

Originally posted by MikeGLI:
Interesting.

quote:

Originally posted by Bisleyblackhawk:
Y’all know we are having an increase of violence against law enforcement ranging from dumping water over them to outright murder ...ICE is under attack from the left for upholding the law. It doesn’t take a stretch of imagination for this cock sucker (I use this term literally) is adding fuel to the fire with his $500 bounty offer to kill an ICE agent (the “Squad” more than likely supports this). First I am surprised with his being acquitted...but I’m also surprised that any members of this Forum have posted what I (and others here) consider “support” for his words ”...

Well fuck me running...sadly I digress...God bless this officer and his family as they deal with this tragedy...we are in a war in this nation

https://www.foxnews.com/us/ark...ment-deadly-incident

quote:

Originally posted by arcwelder:
Wow.

The lengths some will go to rather than admitting they're wrong.

No, you don't have the right to make threats. It's also worth pointing out that the Constitution doesn't grant the right of free speech, or to bare arms. It limits what the government may do in both cases.

We all have natural rights, but those are not unlimited. Point of fact, the limit is often when you intersect with someone else's rights. Such as your speech being free, until you threaten harm to someone else.

I'm disappointed in both members, but at least one is an adult.

quote:

At least in the standard historical usage of the term, a right is something that exists simultaneously among people. A right confers no obligation on another. For example, the right to free speech is something we all possess. My right to free speech imposes no obligation upon another except that of non-interference. Similarly, I have a right to travel freely. That right imposes no obligation upon another except that of non-interference.

quote:

Originally posted by dewhorse:
So I am curious, was he acquitted due to the fact that the court did not believe he really meant it?

So basically unless someone actually killed an ICE agent and cited his communication he is ok?

So what if someone did the same to him?

I guess it makes sense a bit since people have been saying the same about Trump and while they normally get a visit by the SS they are not often arrested unless the SS believes they pose a credible threat.

quote:

Originally posted by 12131:

quote:

Originally posted by dewhorse:
So I am curious, was he acquitted due to the fact that the court did not believe he really meant it?

So basically unless someone actually killed an ICE agent and cited his communication he is ok?

So what if someone did the same to him?

I guess it makes sense a bit since people have been saying the same about Trump and while they normally get a visit by the SS they are not often arrested unless the SS believes they pose a credible threat.

I don't know. I could be wrong, but I don't think anybody ever advertised that they will pay others to kill the President. Other shit, yes, but they are not the same thing as what the asshole of the OP solicited.

quote:

Originally posted by dewhorse:

quote:

Originally posted by 12131:

quote:

Originally posted by dewhorse:
So I am curious, was he acquitted due to the fact that the court did not believe he really meant it?

So basically unless someone actually killed an ICE agent and cited his communication he is ok?

So what if someone did the same to him?

I guess it makes sense a bit since people have been saying the same about Trump and while they normally get a visit by the SS they are not often arrested unless the SS believes they pose a credible threat.

I don't know. I could be wrong, but I don't think anybody ever advertised that they will pay others to kill the President. Other shit, yes, but they are not the same thing as what the asshole of the OP solicited.

Agreed...just trying to understand why he was acquitted, was there a valid legal reason or was it due to the location of the trial and the bias of the court.

quote:

Originally posted by darthfuster:

quote:

Originally posted by dewhorse:
Agreed...just trying to understand why he was acquitted, was there a valid legal reason or was it due to the location of the trial and the bias of the court.

....jury of his peers.

quote:

Originally posted by Shaql:
Doesn't the presiding judge have the authority to override the jury? I seem to recall that in the past.