SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  What's Your Deal!    Poor Writing, Non-Existant Proof-Reading
Page 1 2 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Poor Writing, Non-Existant Proof-Reading Login/Join 
Member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by PHPaul:
On the subject of proof reading, I check my typing before posting and still wind up going back and editing the post later. Something about seeing it "live" versus editing while typing.


Im that way too.
 
Posts: 814 | Location: Southern Michigan | Registered: May 30, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of erj_pilot
posted Hide Post
^^^^^
Same here...



"If you’re a leader, you lead the way. Not just on the easy ones; you take the tough ones too…” – MAJ Richard D. Winters (1918-2011), E Company, 2nd Battalion, 506th Parachute Infantry Regiment, 101st Airborne

"Woe to those who call evil good, and good evil... Therefore, as tongues of fire lick up straw and as dry grass sinks down in the flames, so their roots will decay and their flowers blow away like dust; for they have rejected the law of the Lord Almighty and spurned the word of the Holy One of Israel." - Isaiah 5:20,24
 
Posts: 7477 | Location: NW Houston | Registered: April 04, 2012Reply With QuoteReport This Post
On the DL
Picture of V-Tail
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by triggertreat:
quote:
Originally posted by PHPaul:
On the subject of proof reading, I check my typing before posting and still wind up going back and editing the post later. Something about seeing it "live" versus editing while typing.
Im that way too.
Big Grin



A mind is a terrible thing.
 
Posts: 23481 | Location: Central Florida (near Orlando) | Registered: January 03, 2010Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Lead slingin'
Parrot Head
Picture of Modern Day Savage
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by V-Tail:
I just caught two annoying errors in back-to-back paragraphs in a book that I'm currently reading:
  • "ground crewmen ran out to place chalks against the landing gear," and

  • "One of the two pilots, Air Force Lieutenant Commander"
Things like this really diminish my enjoyment of a book.


I'm in complete agreement on the poor spelling and misused words issue and how pervasive the issue is. I don't have an E-reader of any sort, but catch the issue in news articles almost daily. I'm guilty myself and have had my share of mistakes get through, but try to proof read my posts.

I blame a combination of schools not emphasizing proper spelling/ grammar, along with today's tech features like auto-correct...and, of course, the rush to publish or print negating proof reading.

It has actually gotten to the point in which I take pleasure when I read or, especially listen to someone who actually speaks well. I just caught an audio interview with the director of the Heritage Foundation, Kay C. James, and that lady spoke and annunciated so well I could have listened to her read a phone book or grocery list.

On the actual mistakes, the chalk/ chock caught my eye immediately, but regarding the usage of Commander, not having the benefit of having read the book or sentence it was used in, is there any chance that it could actually reference a U.S. Navy Lieutenant Commander pilot detached and flying in the U.S. Air Force?

While it isn't necessarily common, there are members from one service branch serving in another service. I recently caught an interview with one U.S. pilot who, at different points in his career, flew for the Navy, the Army, and the Marine Corps. Military test pilots can go through one of two Test Pilot schools, and it is possible for U.S. Air Force pilots to go through the Navy test pilot school at Pax river or Navy pilots to go through the Air Force Test Pilot school at Edwards.

There are also examples in which U.S. Navy pilots are detached to fly in the Air Force Aggressor squadron and I'm aware of Navy F-18 pilots flying Air Force F-16s.
 
Posts: 5420 | Registered: August 21, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
member
Picture of henryaz
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by egregore:
It is - or was - common with newspaper ads taken over the phone to see errors like 4wd trucks with "wenches,"

I saw an ad for a Chevy with a 12 volt rear.



all your sig are belong to us
 
Posts: 9411 | Location: South Congress AZ | Registered: May 27, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
On the DL
Picture of V-Tail
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by henryaz:

I saw an ad for a Chevy with a 12 volt rear.
Speaking of ads -- back in the late 1960s I lived and worked in Puerto Rico. The San Juan Star was an English language newspaper; my co-workers and I all subscribed to it.

While English was the first language for most of the reporters and editorial writers, it was clear that some of the report staff had English as a second language.

I remember seeing an ad that started, "Blue shit company . . ."



A mind is a terrible thing.
 
Posts: 23481 | Location: Central Florida (near Orlando) | Registered: January 03, 2010Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Freethinker
Picture of sigfreund
posted Hide Post
As I’ve mentioned before, I refer to such mistakes as “speed bumps” because for me they are irritants and distractions that interrupt the flow of the read. I guess I should in a way be envious of the people who don’t notice and aren’t bothered by such things. I read a lot because it’s one of my primary forms of entertainment and sources of information, though, and they make a difference. I finished a book recently by Harold Coyle who has written historical and speculative fiction for years, and whose books I usually enjoy. This one, however, had spelling/usage errors on literally almost every page. Whatever proofreading the book had been subject to was obviously nothing more than the automatic MS Word sort: the words were spelled correctly, but they weren’t the right word for the context.

A book I’m reading right how mentions a Marine “lieutenant” corporal.

“He who writes carelessly confesses thereby at the very outset that he does not attach much importance to his own thoughts. ” — Arthur Schopenhauer




“I am prudent, you are fearful, he is panicking.”
— JOS
 
Posts: 42039 | Location: 10,150 Feet Above Sea Level in Colorado | Registered: April 04, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Windhover:
quote:
Originally posted by V-Tail:
quote:
Originally posted by Windhover:
quote:
Originally posted by M1Garandy:

About 22 years ago I was so annoyed my the technical errors in a book about locating and restoring vintage aircraft that I wrote the author a letter with all the mistakes I found...
Since we are nitpicking...

Wink
Would you concede that there is a bit of difference between a simply typo possibly caused by using a small keypad on a phone, and blatant use of incorrect terms?

And a difference between somebody posting a comment on a forum like this, vs. a published book that should have had the attention of an editor and / or a proofreader?


Oh I concede your point. I just thought it was humorous that a response in support of your rant about lack of proof-reading was not proof read before hitting “Post Now” button.


I walked right into that one!

I fixed it too. Wink
 
Posts: 324 | Location: Midwest | Registered: April 13, 2013Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of IntrepidTraveler
posted Hide Post
Eye seam too notice more on e-books rather than paper.




Thus the metric system did not really catch on in the States, unless you count the increasing popularity of the nine-millimeter bullet.
- Dave Barry
 
Posts: 2676 | Location: Carlsbad NM/ Augusta GA | Registered: July 15, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
thin skin can't win
Picture of Georgeair
posted Hide Post
I'm convinced Stephen King purposely has his work proofread to fuck up any firearms/ammo reference he somehow got right and change them back to some nonsensical bullshit just to piss us off.

quote:
bit of difference between a simply typo possibly


Gold.



You only have integrity once. - imprezaguy02

 
Posts: 10550 | Location: Madison, MS | Registered: December 10, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
The problem is that with Kindle and some other media platforms, the pay is low for writing, and there's no requirement for professional editing. Many writers get published through Amazon and other sources who have no real place getting published, or are self-published, and whom never take occasion to seek a professional source of editing.

I am deeply dismayed at the quality of product that's not just available commercially, but out there today. I belong to several writers sites, and am often appalled at what passes for writing, or what's allowed to pass. Reading bad writing, bad grammar, or spelling and word use is painful. To put it out there for sale in unconscionable.

I done seen way too much. It ain't right, I tell ya. It just ain't right.
 
Posts: 4756 | Registered: September 13, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
On the DL
Picture of V-Tail
posted Hide Post
I rarely fail to finish reading a book that I have started. Sort of an irrational compulsion. The book really has to be pretty bad for me to abandon it. The one that I referred to is really bad. Delete from Kindle.

On to the next one: Solomon and Lord by Paul Levine. Very well written, Levine is a craftsman, great writing skill, brings the characters alive, and funny. A courtroom exchange:

Judge: "Are we ready to proceed?"

Solomon: "Yes, your honor."

Judge: "Call your first witness."

Solomon: "Defense calls Mr. Ruffles."

Lord: "OBJECTION!"

Judge: "On what grounds?"

Lord: "Mr. Ruffles is a bird."



A mind is a terrible thing.
 
Posts: 23481 | Location: Central Florida (near Orlando) | Registered: January 03, 2010Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2  
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  What's Your Deal!    Poor Writing, Non-Existant Proof-Reading

© SIGforum 2020