SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  What's Your Deal!    The phrase 'gun violence'.
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
The phrase 'gun violence'. Login/Join 
Drug Dealer
Picture of Jim Shugart
posted
This really rattles my cage. It implies that the violence is somehow linked with guns and that if the guns were all to disappear then the violence would did disappear with it.

If all firearms in Baltimore were to vanish, the hoodies would say, "Hey fuck! I ain't got no heat! Can't off Jamal now. Guess I'll have to get married, get at job, and maybe buy a house in a couple of years."



When a thing is funny, search it carefully for a hidden truth. - George Bernard Shaw
 
Posts: 15471 | Location: Virginia | Registered: July 03, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
quarter MOA visionary
Picture of smschulz
posted Hide Post
Far worse is the term "assault weapons" and more so how every gun on the planet is described so.
Not to mention the term "arsenal" for any ammo qty to exceed a box or two and more than a couple weapons.
Mad
 
Posts: 22858 | Location: Houston, TX | Registered: June 11, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of hi-power man
posted Hide Post
I ran across an interesting short comment about the words "gun violence" at this sight:

https://www.usconcealedcarry.c...nating-gun-violence/


* * * * * * *
High capacity is not an acceptable substitute for good marksmanship.
 
Posts: 867 | Location: Kentucky | Registered: December 07, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Drug Dealer
Picture of Jim Shugart
posted Hide Post
Thanks, hi-p man: A very well written article.



When a thing is funny, search it carefully for a hidden truth. - George Bernard Shaw
 
Posts: 15471 | Location: Virginia | Registered: July 03, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Domestic violence. Hmmmm. Used to be called wife beating or in more recent times, spousal abuse. The first time I heard it I thought it was abusing the maid or butler. Domestics is not a term you hear much anymore.

Our language has changed to incorporate political beliefs and attitudes. I do not much care for the changes.
 
Posts: 17177 | Location: Stuck at home | Registered: January 02, 2015Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
That rattles you? How about "COMMON SENSE" gun laws. I mean, how can you or anyone be against common sense?

Jesus
 
Posts: 1918 | Location: Pacific Northwet | Registered: August 01, 2012Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Staring back
from the abyss
Picture of Gustofer
posted Hide Post
I like "semi-automatic handgun". They're pretty much all semi-automatic (unless someone invented a bolt action pistol), but slapping the descriptor "semi-automatic" on them makes them sound scarier and much much MUCH more dangerous.


________________________________________________________
"Great danger lies in the notion that we can reason with evil." Doug Patton.
 
Posts: 19975 | Location: Montana | Registered: November 01, 2010Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
It is total nonsense.
It strings together two nouns which mean nothing together.
"violence"; noun: behavior involving physical force intended to damage or kill.
The implication is that an inanimate object (gun) can act (be violent) which is nonsense.

How about; Apple violence, or Pickle violence?

It is a simple minded idea promulgated by those without better ideas.
 
Posts: 3853 | Location: Citrus County Florida | Registered: October 13, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of side_shot
posted Hide Post
hollow point bullets are cop killers because they are armor piercing and go thru bullet proof vests Eek


"They that can give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety."
--Benjamin Franklin, 1759--


Special Edition - Reverse TT 229ST.Sig Logo'd CTC Grips., Bedair guide rod

 
Posts: 1245 | Location: New Hampshire "Live Free or Die"  | Registered: September 02, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
guns are not violent, People are.


I've got a .22 lr paycheck and .41 mag tastes

Rather be judged by 12 than carried by 6
 
Posts: 76 | Location: Dewitt, Iowa | Registered: December 05, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Oriental Redneck
Picture of 12131
posted Hide Post
Because it's easier to blame inanimate objects than the killers themselves.


Q






 
Posts: 26203 | Location: TEXAS | Registered: September 04, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Take a look at page 55 of the injunction in the Duncan v. Becerra case. The judge took the topic of "gun violence" on and basically re-wrote what it should mean.

This is the case in California that is working to block the requirement that citizens must give up any magazines with a capacity greater than 10 rounds.

In fact, the WHOLE injunction is good reading - the judge who wrote this did a nice job.

http://michellawyers.com/wp-co...inary-Injunction.pdf

To quote a portion:

The Attorney General articulates four important objectives to justify this new statutory bludgeon. They all swing at reducing “gun violence.” The bludgeon swings to knock large capacity magazines out of the hands of criminals. If the bludgeon does not work, then the criminals still clinging to their large capacity magazines will be thrown in jail while the magazines are destroyed as a public nuisance. The problem is the bludgeon indiscriminately hammers all that is in its path. Here, it also hammers magazines out of the hands of long time law-abiding citizens. It hammers the 15-round magazine as well as the 100-round drum. And it throws the law-abiding, self-defending citizen who continues to possess a magazine able to hold more than 10 rounds into the same jail cell as the criminal. Gun violence to carry out crime is horrendous and should be condemned by all. Defensive gun violence may be the only way a law-abiding citizen can avoid becoming a victim.
Put differently, violent gun use is a constitutionally-protected means for law-abiding citizens to protect themselves from criminals. The phrase “gun violence” may not be invoked as a talismanic incantation to justify any exercise of state power.
 
Posts: 2768 | Location: Northern California | Registered: December 01, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Don't Panic
Picture of joel9507
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Gustofer:
I like "semi-automatic handgun". They're pretty much all semi-automatic (unless someone invented a bolt action pistol)

That phrase does at least rule these out:
 
Posts: 15001 | Location: North Carolina | Registered: October 15, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Gustofer:
I like "semi-automatic handgun". They're pretty much all semi-automatic (unless someone invented a bolt action pistol), but slapping the descriptor "semi-automatic" on them makes them sound scarier and much much MUCH more dangerous.

There are bolt-action pistols, and also these crazy things called "revolvers."
 
Posts: 2466 | Location: WI | Registered: December 29, 2012Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Staring back
from the abyss
Picture of Gustofer
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by bigwagon:
...and also these crazy things called "revolvers."
What happens every time you pull the trigger on a double action revolver?

And I did say, "pretty much".


________________________________________________________
"Great danger lies in the notion that we can reason with evil." Doug Patton.
 
Posts: 19975 | Location: Montana | Registered: November 01, 2010Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata  
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  What's Your Deal!    The phrase 'gun violence'.

© SIGforum 2024