SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  What's Your Deal!    My tax rant
Page 1 2 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
My tax rant Login/Join 
Member
posted
I am very lucky this year to receive a large tax return. I say lucky because only a deployment (4 months of non-taxable income) saved my ass. If it wasn't for that I would have went from a healthy return to almost nothing. Reason being? I make too much.

This isn't a humble brag either. Around this area I make enough to live a middle class lifestyle. I sold my nice truck and drive a jalopy to send my kids to private school and pay for their extracurricular activities. The cost of living sucks, which is a reality for most of us in the northeast. I choose to live here so I accept that fact.

However, what irks me is that the Federal tax code does not recognize the obvious income disparities between certain areas. 150k a year in the Northeast is not what it is in Kansas. But to the feds - it's all the same. For example:

From 140k to 170k they start reducing how much student loan interest you can deduct. At 170k it stops entirely.

At 150k you can no longer deduct rental losses.

At 160k you are in a higher tax bracket all together.

That income range is not that impressive around here. It's pretty average. So now I am going to have to play some (legal) games to get my AGI down for next year. And I was considering taking on another part-time job (in addition to the one I already have) but that is entirely out of the question because I would be working to pay more taxes essentially.

Rant off.
 
Posts: 2690 | Location: Baltimore | Registered: October 22, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
No, not like
Bill Clinton
Picture of BigSwede
posted Hide Post
I claim zero and pay an additional $150 a week to IRS just so I don't owe them as much every April. It's sickening to think about.
My kids are grown and only have the mortgage interest to write off



 
Posts: 5302 | Location: GA | Registered: September 23, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Fighting the good fight
Picture of RogueJSK
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by BigSwede:
I claim zero and pay an additional $150 a week to IRS just so I don't owe them as much every April.

My kids are grown and only have the mortgage interest to write off


Ditto. Except mine's only an extra $25 a week.

Now that we can't claim any kids any more, all the wife's tutoring and test proctoring 1099 work throughout the year really screws our withholding calculations.
 
Posts: 32428 | Location: Northwest Arkansas | Registered: January 06, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Striker in waiting
Picture of BurtonRW
posted Hide Post
Brother, I feel your pain. You think paying taxes here is bad, you should try buying a house at a reasonable price in Anne Arundel Co.!

I can speak from recent experience, as we just got the contract back from the sellers last week.

For what I'm paying here, I could have twice as much house on twice as much land pretty much anywhere else (outside of central Maryland) and still have change left over for a cabinet full of Class III toys.

-Rob




I predict that there will be many suggestions and statements about the law made here, and some of them will be spectacularly wrong. - jhe888

A=A
 
Posts: 16263 | Location: Maryland, AA Co. | Registered: March 16, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by BurtonRW:
Brother, I feel your pain. You think paying taxes here is bad, you should try buying a house at a reasonable price in Anne Arundel Co.!

I can speak from recent experience, as we just got the contract back from the sellers last week.

For what I'm paying here, I could have twice as much house on twice as much land pretty much anywhere else (outside of central Maryland) and still have change left over for a cabinet full of Class III toys.

-Rob


I am stuck here in Baltimore County because my MIL helps us a ton and she doesn't drive on any of the 95s and certainly not through the tunnels. I would have preferred AA County but couldn't have afforded the really nice areas anyway. I work at Meade so it would have been nice for my commute!

And yes I think about that often - how much land and house we could have elsewhere. My friend with the FAA took a job outside of Atlanta, bought a house twice as big as mine on 3 acres with a pond and it was just about half price from what I paid. Some people I know have been exploring West Virginia but that drive seems like it would be terrible. I commuted to Andrews for years and that was bad enough.

Once my kids get older there is about a ZERO percent chance I stay in this state. If it were up to me alone we would have already moved.
 
Posts: 2690 | Location: Baltimore | Registered: October 22, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Nullus Anxietas
Picture of ensigmatic
posted Hide Post
The problem, AJ, is what you're more-or-less suggesting is your Federal tax burden should be reduced because your local cost of living is higher. Based on that theory, people in many places of the country would face lower tax rates because they live in more expensive neighbourhoods--or even entire states. (E.g.: California.)

Were the Federal tax code amended to provide for that, the tax burden on people living in lower COL areas would have to be increased to make up for the shortfall. Many people live in lower COL areas because they can't afford to live in more expensive areas. Bumping their tax burden would be essentially subsidizing more wealthy people.

That hardly seems fair. Your choice of where to live, regardless the reason(s), should not become my burden.



"America is at that awkward stage. It's too late to work within the system,,,, but too early to shoot the bastards." -- Claire Wolfe
"If we let things terrify us, life will not be worth living." -- Seneca the Younger, Roman Stoic philosopher
 
Posts: 26009 | Location: S.E. Michigan | Registered: January 06, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by ensigmatic:
The problem, AJ, is what you're more-or-less suggesting is your Federal tax burden should be reduced because your local cost of living is higher. Based on that theory, people in many places of the country would face lower tax rates because they live in more expensive neighbourhoods--or even entire states. (E.g.: California.)

Were the Federal tax code amended to provide for that, the tax burden on people living in lower COL areas would have to be increased to make up for the shortfall. Many people live in lower COL areas because they can't afford to live in more expensive areas. Bumping their tax burden would be essentially subsidizing more wealthy people.

That hardly seems fair. Your choice of where to live, regardless the reason(s), should not become my burden.


I see your point, but on the flip side, aren't people in high wage areas subsidizing the people living in low wage areas? Think about it on the federal level only - am I using more federal benefits than someone in the midwest? Probably not. Actually in my area and in my tax bracket, I use far less, but yet I am paying much more. Think about the federal aide that goes for Tornado damage, earthquakes, wildfires, etc. Those events are ultra rare in the Northeast.

Check out this map - https://taxfoundation.org/fede...id-reliance-rankings

Seems like the higher tax areas use less federal aid. I could live in Montana for far, far less than what it costs in Maryland, but yet far more federal tax dollars go to Montana. Is that a fair system? I am not sure what the answer is to that question. I am not sure what changes could be made it's just frustrating.
 
Posts: 2690 | Location: Baltimore | Registered: October 22, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Do No Harm,
Do Know Harm
posted Hide Post
No website in the world is going to convince me that Montana wastes more tax dollars than Maryland.

How many people are on the government tit in Maryland? Probably more in Baltimore alone than in the entire state of Montana.

What is the destination for federal dollars in Montana? National Parks? Border costs? Indian Reservations?




Knowing what one is talking about is widely admired but not strictly required here.

Although sometimes distracting, there is often a certain entertainment value to this easy standard.
-JALLEN

"All I need is a WAR ON DRUGS reference and I got myself a police thread BINGO." -jljones
 
Posts: 11444 | Location: NC | Registered: August 16, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
The Unmanned Writer
Picture of LS1 GTO
posted Hide Post
And IMHO, we should consider having a flat tax. Regardless of how much you earn, you pay the same percentage (no deductions).

Earn $30k, pay $3K

Earn $3M, pay $300K

7% goes to the Fed, 3% goes to the state.
(Or some other percentage)







Life moves pretty fast. If you don't stop and look around once in a while, you could miss it.



Only in an insane world are the sane considered insane.


The memories of a man in his old age
Are the deeds of a man in his prime


 
Posts: 14020 | Location: It was Lat: 33.xxxx Lon: 44.xxxx now it's CA :( | Registered: March 22, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Still finding my way
Picture of Ryanp225
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by LS1 GTO:
And IMHO, we should consider having a flat tax. Regardless of how much you earn, you pay the same percentage (no deductions).

Earn $30k, pay $3K

Earn $3M, pay $300K

7% goes to the Fed, 3% goes to the state.
(Or some other percentage)

From your lips to God's ears...
 
Posts: 10827 | Registered: January 04, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Ugly Bag of
Mostly Water
Picture of ridgerat
posted Hide Post
Instead of part-time jobs, You should write (and sell) children's books.



Endowment Life Member, NRA • Member, Gun Owners of America & Member, Arizona Citizens Defense League
 
Posts: 2828 | Location: Tucson, AZ | Registered: March 25, 2012Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Children's books, funny.

That's one reason I fled the Bay Area. A 16 percent pay cut resulted in a 30 percent increase in lifestyle, if not more. My Ky house was almost 4 times the size of my Bay Area dump townhouse and cost less, too.
 
Posts: 17121 | Location: Lexington, KY | Registered: October 15, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Bookers Bourbon
and a good cigar
Picture of Johnny 3eagles
posted Hide Post
Eliminate the Income Tax and replace it with a Value Added Tax. That way, even illegal gains are taxed when buying something. Kinda like when the 18 year old drug dealer buys a BMW with his drug money. He doesn't pay income tax on his drug money now.



BIDEN SUCKS.

If you're goin' through hell, keep on going.
Don't slow down. If you're scared don't show it.
You might get out before the devil even knows you're there.


NRA ENDOWMENT LIFE MEMBER
 
Posts: 7120 | Location: Arkansas  | Registered: November 06, 2010Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by LS1 GTO:
And IMHO, we should consider having a flat tax. Regardless of how much you earn, you pay the same percentage (no deductions).

Earn $30k, pay $3K

Earn $3M, pay $300K

7% goes to the Fed, 3% goes to the state.
(Or some other percentage)


It is absolute insanity when you look at the income tax rates for the highest brackets. Cardi B gave some excellent hood commentary on this issue when she first made it big.

And yes I will do Children's Books with the former Mayor of Baltimore once she gets out of the pokey Big Grin
 
Posts: 2690 | Location: Baltimore | Registered: October 22, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Ignored facts
still exist
posted Hide Post
I could never figure out why Mortgage interest is generally deductible.


----------------------
Let's Go Brandon!
 
Posts: 10860 | Location: 45 miles from the Pacific Ocean | Registered: February 28, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Fighting the good fight
Picture of RogueJSK
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by radioman:
I could never figure out why Mortgage interest is generally deductible.


To incentivise home ownership. There are other home-related tax breaks as well, such as the capital gains exclusion for the sale of a primary residence.

And apparently, in the initial tax code, all interest was deductible. Since then, the code has morphed into where only certain types of interest are deductible, with mortgage interest remaining as one of them.
 
Posts: 32428 | Location: Northwest Arkansas | Registered: January 06, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of Leemur
posted Hide Post
We paid in over $25k. We’re getting back $2700. We’ll pay in the same or more next year but get back less if I make it in my job I just started. Mad
 
Posts: 13735 | Location: Shenandoah Valley, VA | Registered: October 16, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
I usually come out getting back from the Fed what I owe to the State. I'd rather keep all my money and be required to give a little up than ask for more back.
 
Posts: 363 | Registered: January 07, 2020Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of 229DAK
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by RogueJSK:
quote:
Originally posted by radioman:
I could never figure out why Mortgage interest is generally deductible.


To incentivise home ownership. There are other home-related tax breaks as well, such as the capital gains exclusion for the sale of a primary residence.

And apparently, in the initial tax code, all interest was deductible. Since then, the code has morphed into where only certain types of interest are deductible, with mortgage interest remaining as one of them.

I remember when credit card interest was deductible.


_________________________________________________________________________
“A man’s treatment of a dog is no indication of the man’s nature, but his treatment of a cat is. It is the crucial test. None but the humane treat a cat well.”
-- Mark Twain, 1902
 
Posts: 9001 | Location: Northern Virginia | Registered: November 04, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
If you're gonna be a
bear, be a Grizzly!
Picture of Todd Huffman
posted Hide Post
I owed $12 this year to the Fed and $190 to the state. I call that a pretty good tax year.




Here's to the sunny slopes of long ago.
 
Posts: 3633 | Location: Morganton, NC | Registered: December 31, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2  
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  What's Your Deal!    My tax rant

© SIGforum 2024