SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  SIG Armorer    DAK question RE P239 and P220
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
DAK question RE P239 and P220 Login/Join 
Member
posted
Anyone know if the P239 and P220 frames are all DAK compatible, or if they have to have the extra little bit machined out of the frame like the P226/229? i.e.-would a 2000 vintage P239 be DAK parts compatible?
 
Posts: 1092 | Location: Michigan | Registered: June 11, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
That's just the
Flomax talking
Picture of GaryBF
posted Hide Post
quote:
i.e.-would a 2000 vintage P239 be DAK parts compatible?

No way. The DAK trigger wasn't even introduced until 2004, or thereabout, and SIGs had dedicated frames for several years after that.
 
Posts: 11875 | Location: St. Louis, Missouri | Registered: February 04, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Freethinker
Picture of sigfreund
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by GaryBF:
quote:
i.e.-would a 2000 vintage P239 be DAK parts compatible?

No way. The DAK trigger wasn't even introduced until 2004, or thereabout, and SIGs had dedicated frames for several years after that.




6.4/93.6

“Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have to say something.”
— Plato
 
Posts: 47366 | Location: 10,150 Feet Above Sea Level in Colorado | Registered: April 04, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
I can only speak for the 239 as I have never seen a new frame 220, but on the 239 there is a noticeable difference on the frame cutout on the right side below the frame rails where the trigger bar goes behind the hammer. All new 239's are cut this way, even if they come with a DA/SA trigger.


_______________________________



Sig, Colt M-16/M-4/1911 and Glock Armorer.
I love my P229, but if I had to go to a war, I would take my Glock...
 
Posts: 575 | Location: LI, NY | Registered: November 26, 2011Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata  
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  SIG Armorer    DAK question RE P239 and P220

© SIGforum 2024