SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  Gun Control Discussion    Intent of 2nd Amendment is crystal clear

Moderators: Chris Orndorff, LDD

Closed Topic Closed
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Intent of 2nd Amendment is crystal clear Login/Join 
Normality Contraindicated
Picture of italia
posted
WND Article Link

Intent of 2nd Amendment is crystal clear

The dean of the University of Michigan Law School was Thomas Cooley, who died Sept. 12, 1898.

Thomas Cooley was chief justice of Michigan’s Supreme Court, president of the American Bar Association and the first chairman of the Interstate Commerce Commission. His commentaries were influential in shaping American law.

He declined offers to teach at Hastings College of Law, University of Texas, Johns Hopkins University, Boston Law School, University of Pennsylvania and Cornell Law School.

In “Constitutional Limitations,” eighth Edition, Volume 2, p. 966, 974, Thomas Cooley stated: “While thus careful to establish, protect, and defend religious freedom and equality, the American constitutions contain no provisions which prohibit the authorities from such solemn recognition of a superintending Providence in public transactions and exercises as the general religious sentiment of mankind inspires, and as seems meet and proper in finite and dependent beings.”

Cooley continued: “Whatever may be the shades of religious belief, all must acknowledge the fitness of recognizing in important human affairs the superintending care and control of the great Governor of the Universe, and of acknowledging with thanksgiving His boundless favors, of bowing in contrition when visited with the penalties of His broken laws.”

Discover more of Bill Federer’s eye-opening books and videos in the WND Superstore!

In his “General Principles of Constitutional Law,” 1890, Thomas Cooley wrote: “It was never intended by the Constitution that the government should be prohibited from recognizing religion, or that religious worship should never be provided for in cases where a proper recognition of Divine Providence in the working of government might seem to require it, and where it might be done without drawing an invidious distinction between religious beliefs, organizations, or sects.”

Thomas Cooley continued: “The Christian religion was always recognized in the administration of the common law of the land, the fundamental principles of that religion must continue to be recognized in the same cases and to the same extent as formerly.”

James H. Landman, director of community programs for the American Bar Association Division for Public Education in Chicago, wrote in “Trying Beliefs: The Law of Cultural Orthodoxy and Dissent” (published in Insights on Law and Society, American Bar Association Division for Public Education, Winter 2002, Vol. 2, No. 2): “For most of our history, the majority of Americans have practiced some form of Christian Protestantism. … In 1925 … public schools … still played a significant role in inculcating Anglo-Protestant moral values.”

Signer of the Constitution Gouverneur Morris wrote: “Americans need never fear their government because of the advantage of being armed, which the Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation.”

Thomas Cooley stated of the Second Amendment: “The right is general. It may be supposed from the phraseology of this provision that the right to keep and bear arms was only guaranteed to the militia; but this would be an interpretation not warranted by the intent. The militia, as has been explained elsewhere, consists of those persons who, under the law, are liable to the performance of military duty, and are officered and enrolled for service when called upon. … If the right were limited to those enrolled, the purpose of the guarantee might be defeated altogether by the action or the neglect to act of the government it was meant to hold in check. The meaning of the provision undoubtedly is, that the people, from whom the militia must be taken, shall have the right to keep and bear arms, and they need no permission or regulation of law for that purpose.”

Thomas Cooley wrote in People v. Hurlbut (24 Mich. 44, 108 (1871): “Local government is a matter of absolute right; and the state cannot take it away.”
 
Posts: 2516 | Location: Tennessee | Registered: January 26, 2010Report This Post
Member
Picture of ersatzknarf
posted Hide Post
ran across this while looking for a "Je suis Deplorable" photo:





gives one pause...



Cheers,
Frank

Dogs are gifts from God, full of love. Save a life, adopt!

…and God made dogs, and it was very good, and God said: “I’m gonna have to have all of these back.” Genesis 1, gospel according to Mr. Monkey ✡

NRA Life Member Smile . . . GOA member, too. NRA Endowment Life Member (May, 2016) Big Grin

私のホバークラフトは鰻でいっぱいです!
 
Posts: 2370 | Location: too near debt-riot, mitch-e-gan | Registered: June 06, 2012Report This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
The linked article is poorly written in my opinion. The title of it talks about the 2nd amendment, but the bulk of the article is about freedom of religion. Then randomly includes a quote by Morris then back to Cooley, but it's not clear where he is citing the quoted reference about Cooley's interpretation of the 2nd amendment.



 
Posts: 152 | Location: ATL | Registered: June 28, 2006Report This Post
  Powered by Social Strata  

Closed Topic Closed

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  Gun Control Discussion    Intent of 2nd Amendment is crystal clear

© SIGforum 2017